Oxford Hip Scores at 6 Months and 5 Years Are Associated With Total Hip Revision Within the Subsequent 2 Years

被引:29
作者
Devane, Peter [1 ]
Horne, Geoffrey [1 ]
Gehling, Daniel J. [2 ]
机构
[1] CCDHB Wellington Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; REPLACEMENT; OUTCOMES; VARIABLES; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-013-2880-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Oxford hip score (OHS) is commonly reported in research studies as a reflection of pain and function but it is unclear whether it predicts subsequent prosthesis failure. We determined whether OHS obtained at 6 months and 5 years after surgery predicts risk of revision within the subsequent 2 years. We reviewed data from the New Zealand Joint Registry between January 1999 and December 2010. OHS at 6 months was available for 17,831 total hip patients. Patients were separated into four categories based on their OHS: 10,458 (59%) scored 42-48, 4726 (26%) scored 34-41, 1592 (9%) scored 27-33, and 1028 (6%) scored 0-26. Five-year OHSs were available for 3665 patients. Of these patients, 2619 (72%) scored 42-48, 657 (18%) scored 34-41, 225 (6%) scored 27-33, and 164 (4%) scored 0-26. For patients with a 6-month OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 0.4% in the 42-48 group, 1.0% in the 34-41 group, 1.7% in the 27-33 group, and 6.2% in the 0-27 group. For patients with 5-year OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 0.3%, 1.1%, 3.6%, and 6.1%, respectively. Increase in revision risk for the 0-27 versus the 42-48 OHS group was 15-fold at 6 months and 18-fold at 5 years. Our data suggest patients with an OHS of 42-48 at 6 months need a 5-year postoperative appointment. Those patients with a 5-year OHS of 42-48 need not be followed up for a further 5 years. Level III, retrospective, comparative study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:3870 / 3874
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Measuring hip outcomes: Common scales and checklists [J].
Ahmad, M. A. ;
Xypnitos, F. N. ;
Giannoudis, P. V. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (03) :259-264
[2]   Statistics notes - The cost of dichotomising continuous variables [J].
Altman, DG ;
Royston, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7549) :1080-1080
[3]   The Cost-effectiveness of Routine Follow-up After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Bolz, Katharina Maria Dorothea ;
Crawford, Ross W. ;
Donnelly, Bill ;
Whitehouse, Sarah L. ;
Graves, Nicholas .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (02) :191-196
[4]   Determinants of 6-12 month postoperative functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement [J].
Braeken, AM ;
Lochhaas-Gerlach, JA ;
Gollish, JD ;
Myles, JD ;
MacKenzie, TA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 9 (06) :413-418
[5]   Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty - A comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments [J].
Bullens, PHJ ;
van Loon, CJM ;
Malefijt, MCD ;
Laan, RFJM ;
Veth, RPH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (06) :740-747
[6]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A ;
Murray, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02) :185-190
[7]   The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement [J].
Field, RE ;
Cronin, MD ;
Singh, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05) :618-622
[8]  
Fortin PR, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V42, P1722, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1722::AID-ANR22>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-R
[10]   Categorisation of continuous exposure variables revisited. A response to the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study [J].
Froslie, Kathrine F. ;
Roislien, Jo ;
Laake, Petter ;
Henriksen, Tore ;
Qvigstad, Elisabeth ;
Veierod, Marit B. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10