Oxford Hip Scores at 6 Months and 5 Years Are Associated With Total Hip Revision Within the Subsequent 2 Years

被引:28
作者
Devane, Peter [1 ]
Horne, Geoffrey [1 ]
Gehling, Daniel J. [2 ]
机构
[1] CCDHB Wellington Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; REPLACEMENT; OUTCOMES; VARIABLES; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-013-2880-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Oxford hip score (OHS) is commonly reported in research studies as a reflection of pain and function but it is unclear whether it predicts subsequent prosthesis failure. We determined whether OHS obtained at 6 months and 5 years after surgery predicts risk of revision within the subsequent 2 years. We reviewed data from the New Zealand Joint Registry between January 1999 and December 2010. OHS at 6 months was available for 17,831 total hip patients. Patients were separated into four categories based on their OHS: 10,458 (59%) scored 42-48, 4726 (26%) scored 34-41, 1592 (9%) scored 27-33, and 1028 (6%) scored 0-26. Five-year OHSs were available for 3665 patients. Of these patients, 2619 (72%) scored 42-48, 657 (18%) scored 34-41, 225 (6%) scored 27-33, and 164 (4%) scored 0-26. For patients with a 6-month OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 0.4% in the 42-48 group, 1.0% in the 34-41 group, 1.7% in the 27-33 group, and 6.2% in the 0-27 group. For patients with 5-year OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 0.3%, 1.1%, 3.6%, and 6.1%, respectively. Increase in revision risk for the 0-27 versus the 42-48 OHS group was 15-fold at 6 months and 18-fold at 5 years. Our data suggest patients with an OHS of 42-48 at 6 months need a 5-year postoperative appointment. Those patients with a 5-year OHS of 42-48 need not be followed up for a further 5 years. Level III, retrospective, comparative study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:3870 / 3874
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Measuring hip outcomes: Common scales and checklists
    Ahmad, M. A.
    Xypnitos, F. N.
    Giannoudis, P. V.
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (03): : 259 - 264
  • [2] Statistics notes - The cost of dichotomising continuous variables
    Altman, DG
    Royston, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7549): : 1080 - 1080
  • [3] The Cost-effectiveness of Routine Follow-up After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Bolz, Katharina Maria Dorothea
    Crawford, Ross W.
    Donnelly, Bill
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Graves, Nicholas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [4] Determinants of 6-12 month postoperative functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement
    Braeken, AM
    Lochhaas-Gerlach, JA
    Gollish, JD
    Myles, JD
    MacKenzie, TA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 9 (06) : 413 - 418
  • [5] Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty - A comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments
    Bullens, PHJ
    van Loon, CJM
    Malefijt, MCD
    Laan, RFJM
    Veth, RPH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (06) : 740 - 747
  • [6] Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement
    Dawson, J
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Carr, A
    Murray, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02): : 185 - 190
  • [7] The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement
    Field, RE
    Cronin, MD
    Singh, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05): : 618 - 622
  • [8] Fortin PR, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V42, P1722, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1722::AID-ANR22>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-R
  • [10] Categorisation of continuous exposure variables revisited. A response to the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study
    Froslie, Kathrine F.
    Roislien, Jo
    Laake, Petter
    Henriksen, Tore
    Qvigstad, Elisabeth
    Veierod, Marit B.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10