Realization of stochastic systems with exogenous inputs and subspace identification methods

被引:52
作者
Katayama, T [1 ]
Picci, G
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Informat, Dept Appl Math & Phys, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
[2] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Elettron & Informat, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[3] CNR, LADSEB, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
stochastic realization; exogenous inputs; canonical correlation analysis; oblique projection; subspace identification;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00072-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper solves the stochastic realization problem for a discrete-time stationary process with an exogenous input. The oblique projection of the future outputs on the space of the past observations along the space of the future inputs is factorized as a product of the extended observability matrix and the state vector. The state vector is chosen by using the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) of past and future conditioned on the future inputs. We then derive the state equations of the optimal predictor of the future outputs in terms of the state vector and the future inputs. These equations lead to a forward innovation model for the output process in the presence of exogenous inputs. The basic step of the realization procedure is a factorization of the conditional covariance matrix of future outputs and past data given future inputs. This factorization is based on CCA and can be easily adapted to finite input-output data. We derive four stochastic subspace identification algorithms which adapt the realization procedure to finite input-output data. Numerical results are also included. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1652
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   STOCHASTIC THEORY OF MINIMAL REALIZATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :667-674
[2]   MARKOVIAN REPRESENTATION OF STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES BY CANONICAL VARIABLES [J].
AKAIKE, H .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL, 1975, 13 (01) :162-173
[3]  
Akaike H., 1976, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO, V126, P27, DOI [10.1016/S0076-5392(08)60869-3, 10. 1016/S0076-5392(08)60869-3]
[4]  
Aoki Masanao., 2013, STATE SPACE MODELING
[5]  
CAINES PE, 1976, SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIO, P349
[6]   Experimental evidence showing that stochastic subspace identification methods may fail [J].
Dahlen, A ;
Lindquist, A ;
Mari, J .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1998, 34 (05) :303-312
[7]   A REALIZATION APPROACH TO STOCHASTIC-MODEL REDUCTION [J].
DESAI, UB ;
PAL, D ;
KIRKPATRICK, RD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1985, 42 (04) :821-838
[8]  
Faurre P., 1979, Operateurs Rationnels Positifs
[9]   ON JOINTLY STATIONARY FEEDBACK-FREE STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES [J].
GEVERS, MR ;
ANDERSON, BDO .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1982, 27 (02) :431-436
[10]  
Golub G.H., 1996, Matrix Computations, Vthird