Effectiveness of mass testing for control of COVID-19: a systematic review protocol

被引:38
作者
Lopes-Junior, Luis Carlos [1 ]
Bomfim, Emiliana [2 ]
Calheiros da Silveira, Denise Sayuri [3 ]
Pessanha, Raphael Manhaes [1 ]
Pimentel Carvalho Schuab, Sara Isabel [1 ]
Garcia Lima, Regina Aparecida [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Espirito Santo UFES, Hlth Sci Ctr, Nursing Dept, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Med, Coll Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Biochem & Immunol, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Maternal Infant & Publ Hlth Nursing Dept, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
关键词
infectious diseases; public health; health policy; health services administration & management; epidemiology; CANCER; INTERVENTIONS; SARS-COV-2; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040413
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Since March 2020, when the COVID-19 outbreak has been deemed a pandemic by the WHO, the SARS-CoV-2 spreading has been the focus of attention of scientists, authorities, public health agencies and communities around the world. One of the great concerns and challenges, mainly in low-income and middle-income countries, is the identification and monitoring of COVID-19 cases. The large-scale availability of testing is a fundamental aspect of COVID-19 control, but it is currently the biggest challenge faced by many countries around the world. We aimed to synthesise and critically evaluate the scientific evidence on the influence of the testing capacity for symptomatic individuals in the control of COVID-19. Methods and analysis A systematic review will be conducted in eight databases, such as Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, ISI-of-Knowledge, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, SCOPUS, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, PsycINFO and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, from inception to 30 July 2020. No restriction regarding the language, publication date or setting will be employed. Primary outcomes will include the sensitivity as well as the specificity of the tests for COVID-19. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Methodological assessment of the studies will be evaluated by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomised controlled trials, the MINORS for non-randomised studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort or case-control studies. Findings will be structured according to the test type and target population characteristics and focused on the primary outcomes (sensitivity and specificity). Moreover, if sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be performed. Pooled standardised mean differences and 95% CIs will be calculated. Heterogeneity between the studies will be determined by I(2)statistics. Subgroup analyses will also be conducted. Publication bias will be assessed with funnel plots and Egger's test. Heterogeneity will be explored by random effects analysis. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated widely via peer-reviewed publication and presentations at conferences related to this field. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182724.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCA, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10654-010-9491-Z
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, webpage
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BMJ BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.M1036
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, SCI CHINA LIFE SCI, DOI [10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071, DOI 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071]
[6]   Covid-19: testing times [J].
Beeching, Nick J. ;
Fletcher, Tom E. ;
Beadsworth, Mike B. J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 369
[7]  
Burki TK, 2020, LANCET RESP MED, V20
[8]   Telemedicine Infectious Diseases Consultations and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review [J].
Burnham, Jason P. ;
Fritz, Stephanie A. ;
Yaeger, Lauren H. ;
Colditz, Graham A. .
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 6 (12)
[9]   Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline [J].
Campbell, Mhairi ;
McKenzie, Joanne E. ;
Sowden, Amanda ;
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ;
Brennan, Sue E. ;
Ellis, Simon ;
Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie ;
Ryan, Rebecca ;
Shepperd, Sasha ;
Thomas, James ;
Welch, Vivian ;
Thomson, Hilary .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
[10]  
Carver C, 2020, COMP ACCURACY OROPHA