Pretreatment risk management of a novel nomogram model for prediction of thoracoabdominal extrahepatic metastasis in primary hepatic carcinoma

被引:8
作者
Hu, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Kun-He [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Yi-Ping [3 ]
Xu, Song [3 ]
Chen, Si-Hai [1 ,2 ]
He, Yu-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Hai-Liang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yu-Qi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, 17 Yongwai Zheng St, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Inst Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Gastroenterol, 17 Yongwai Zheng St, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, 445 Bayi Rd, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Primary hepatic carcinoma; Thoracoabdominal extrahepatic metastasis; Nomogram; Pretreatment risk management; Individualized clinical decision-making; SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; DISTANT METASTASIS; CLINICAL-FEATURES; COLORECTAL-CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE; TUMOR SIZE; CA125; CEA; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12967-019-1861-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Extrahepatic metastasis is the independent risk factor of poor survival of primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC), and most occurs in the chest and abdomen. Currently, there is still no available method to predict thoracoabdominal extrahepatic metastasis in PHC. In this study, a novel nomogram model was developed and validated for prediction of thoracoabdominal extrahepatic metastasis in PHC, thereby conducted individualized risk management for pretreatment different risk population. Methods: The nomogram model was developed in a primary study that consisted of 330 consecutive pretreatment patients with PHC. Large-scale datasets were extracted from clinical practice. The nomogram was based on the predictors optimized by data dimension reduction through Lasso regression. The prediction performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), and calibrated to decrease the overfit bias. Individualized risk management was conducted by weighing the net benefit of different risk population via decision curve analysis. The prediction performance was internally and independently validated, respectively. An independent-validation study using a separate set of 107 consecutive patients. Results: Four predictors from 55 high-dimensional clinical datasets, including size, portal vein tumor thrombus, infection, and carbohydrate antigen 125, were incorporated to develop a nomogram model. The nomogram demonstrated valuable prediction performance with AUROC of 0.830 (0.803 in internal-validation, and 0.773 in independent-validation, respectively), and fine calibration. Individual risk probability was visually scored. Weighing the net benefit, threshold probability was classified for three-independent risk population, which was < 19.9%, 19.9-71.8% and > 71.8%, respectively. According to this classification, pretreatment risk management was based on a treatment-flowchart for individualized clinical decision-making. Conclusions: The proposed nomogram is a useful tool for pretreatment risk management of thoracoabdominal extrahepatic metastasis in PHC for the first time, and may handily facilitate timely individualized clinical decision-making for different risk population.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Trends in the United States From 1975 to 2005
    Altekruse, Sean F.
    McGlynn, Katherine A.
    Reichman, Marsha E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (09) : 1485 - 1491
  • [2] EMT: 2016
    Angela Nieto, M.
    Huang, Ruby Yun-Ju
    Jackson, Rebecca A.
    Thiery, Jean Paul
    [J]. CELL, 2016, 166 (01) : 21 - 45
  • [3] Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye
    Balachandran, Vinod P.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Smith, J. Joshua
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04) : E173 - E180
  • [4] DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) : 1644 - 1655
  • [5] Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update
    Bruix, Jordi
    Sherman, Morris
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 53 (03) : 1020 - 1022
  • [6] Hepatocellular Carcinoma Extrahepatic Metastasis in Relation to Tumor Size and Alkaline Phosphatase Levels
    Carr, Brian I.
    Guerra, Vito
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2016, 90 (03) : 136 - 142
  • [7] Effect of liver cirrhosis on metastasis in colorectal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study
    Chiou, Wen-Yen
    Chang, Chun-Ming
    Tseng, Kuo-Chih
    Hung, Shih-Kai
    Lin, Hon-Yi
    Chen, Yi-Chun
    Su, Yu-Chieh
    Tseng, Chih-Wei
    Tsai, Shiang-Jiun
    Lee, Moon-Sing
    Li, Chung-Yi
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 45 (02) : 160 - 168
  • [8] Complement Component 3 Is Regulated by TWIST1 and Mediates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
    Cho, Min Soon
    Rupaimoole, Rajesha
    Choi, Hyun-Jin
    Noh, Kyunghee
    Chen, Jichao
    Hu, Qianghua
    Sood, Anil K.
    Afshar-Kharghan, Vahid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 196 (03) : 1412 - 1418
  • [9] The role of microvessel density, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size as prognostic factors of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer
    Cho, Tomonari
    Shiozawa, Eisuke
    Urushibara, Fumihiko
    Arai, Nana
    Funaki, Toshitaka
    Takehara, Yusuke
    Tazawa, Sakiko
    Misawa, Masashi
    Homma, Mayumi
    Norose, Tomoko
    Omatsu, Mutsuko
    Miyachi, Hideyuki
    Yamochi, Toshiko
    Kunimura, Toshiaki
    Tate, Genshu
    Ishida, Fumio
    Kudo, Shin-Ei
    Takimoto, Masahumi
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (06) : 4327 - 4333
  • [10] Markers of Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: Where Are We Now and What Should Be Next?
    Cidon, E. Una
    Alonso, P.
    Masters, B.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 41 - 55