Use of monosodium glutamate by-product in cow diet on performance of lactating dairy cows

被引:10
作者
Padunglerk, Achira [1 ]
Prasanpanich, Somkiert [1 ]
Kongmun, Phongthorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Fac Agr, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
关键词
cow; monosodium glutamate; rumen fermentation; soybean meal; MIXED RUMINAL BACTERIA; MILK-PRODUCTION; AMINO-ACIDS; CARBOHYDRATE SOURCE; UREA NITROGEN; TRUE PROTEIN; GROWTH-RATE; FEED-INTAKE; RUMEN; DIGESTIBILITY;
D O I
10.1111/asj.12572
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Eight multiparous lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned in a 4 x 4 replicated Latin square design to receive four dietary treatments. The dietary treatments were monosodium glutamate by-product (MSGB) replacement for soybean meal in concentrate at four levels: MSGB replacement at 0, 20, 40 and 60%, respectively. Pangola hay was given on an ad libitum basis. It was found that total dry matter intake, concentrate intake, pangola hay intake and all apparent digestibilities were not different among treatments. Ammonia nitrogen concentration in the rumen at 4h post-feeding was significantly different, in which the 0% treatment had the highest (P<0.05) while the 20% treatment had the lowest. Milk fat percentage was the highest (P<0.05) in the 0% treatment. MSGB replacement at 40% and 60% were shown to be the lowest (P<0.05) feed cost for milk production, and profitability of milk production was the highest (P<0.05) for the 60% treatment. Based on this experiment, it could be concluded that MSGB replacement for soybean meal at 20-60% in the feed for dairy cows presented no negative effects on their performances. In addition, it could decrease feed cost 2.9-17.3% and increase milk production profit up to 33.3% in the 60% treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, INDIAN J ANIM SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Official methods of analysis, V13th
[3]  
AOAC, 1995, OFF METH AN AN FEEDS
[4]  
Bach A, 2005, J Dairy Sci, V88 Suppl 1, pE9
[5]   Responses in urea and true protein of milk to different protein feeding schemes for dairy cows [J].
Baker, LD ;
Ferguson, JD ;
Chalupa, W .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1995, 78 (11) :2424-2434
[6]  
BARBANO DM, 1991, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V74, P281
[7]   Effects of different protein supplements on milk production and nutrient utilization in lactating dairy cows [J].
Brito, A. F. ;
Broderick, G. A. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (04) :1816-1827
[8]   Protozoa involved in butyric rather than lactic fermentative pattern during latent acidosis in sheep [J].
Brossard, L ;
Martin, C ;
Chaucheyras-Durand, F ;
Michalet-Doreau, B .
REPRODUCTION NUTRITION DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 44 (03) :195-206
[9]  
CHANEY AL, 1962, CLIN CHEM, V8, P130
[10]  
CROCKER CL, 1967, AM J MED TECHNOL, V33, P361