Prediction of Teachers' Lateness Factors Coming to School Using C4.5, Random Tree, Random Forest Algorithm

被引：0

作者：

Gata, Windu ^{[1
]}

Grand, Grand ^{[1
]}

Patras, Yuyun Elizabeth ^{[2
]}

Hidayat, Rais ^{[2
]}

Fatmasari, Rhini ^{[3
]}

Tohari, Siswanto ^{[4
]}

Baharuddin, Baharuddin ^{[5
]}

Wardhani, Nia Kusuma ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Post Grad STMIK Nusa Mandiri, Comp Sci, Jakarta, Indonesia

[2] Pakuan Univ, Educ Management, Bogor, Indonesia

[3] Univ Terbuka, Educ Management, Jakarta, Indonesia

[4] Budi Luhur Univ, Fac IT, Jakarta, Indonesia

[5] Univ Muhammadiyah Makassar, Fac Islamic Relig, Makassar, Indonesia

[6] Mercubuana Univ, Fac Econ, Jakarta, Indonesia

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT (ICREAM 2018) | 2018年 / 258卷

关键词：

data mining; C4.5; random tree; random forest; accuracy; AUC;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

Lateness arrives at work can be experienced by anyone, including teachers. Teachers who are late arriving at school have shown examples of bad behavior for students. It takes a study to determine the factors that cause a teacher to arrive late to school. Data Mining is selected to process the data that has been available. Processing uses 3 classification algorithms which are decision tree (C4.5, Random Tree, and Random Forest) algorithms. All three algorithms will be tested for known performance, where the best algorithm is determined by accuracy and AUC. The results of the research were obtained that Random Forest with pruning and pre-pruning is the best for accuracy value with 74.63% and also AUC value with 0.743. The teacher's delay in this study is often done by teachers who have a vehicle compared to those who do not have a vehicle.

引用

页码：161 / 166

页数：6

共 50 条

[21] Accident Prediction Accuracy Assessment for Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Using Random Forest Algorithm Compared with Decision Tree
Zhou, Xiaoyi
Lu, Pan
Zheng, Zijian
Tolliver, Denver
Keramati, Amin
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 200
[22] Classification And Prediction Of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Novel Decision Tree Algorithm By Comparing Random Forest For Obtaining Better Accuracy
Rohith, J.
Priyadarsini, Uma P. S.
CARDIOMETRY, 2022, (25): : 1800 - 1807
[23] Using random forest and decision tree models for a new vehicle prediction approach in computational toxicology
Pritesh Mistry
Daniel Neagu
Paul R. Trundle
Jonathan D. Vessey
Soft Computing, 2016, 20 : 2967 - 2979
[24] Using random forest and decision tree models for a new vehicle prediction approach in computational toxicology
Mistry, Pritesh
Neagu, Daniel
Trundle, Paul R.
Vessey, Jonathan D.
SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 20 (08) : 2967 - 2979
[25] Accurate Prediction and Detection of Suicidal Risk using Random Forest Algorithm
Saravanan, N.
Moheshkumar, G.
Shaid, Mohammed V. M.
Purushothman, S.
Sanjai, Gokul, V
2024 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, ICPCSN 2024, 2024, : 287 - 292
[26] Supervised study of Novel Random Forest Algorithm for prediction of heart disease in Comparison With The Decision Tree Algorithm
Teja, P. Prasanna Sai
Veeramani, T.
CARDIOMETRY, 2022, (25): : 1483 - 1490
[27] Prediction of Employee Turn Over Using Random Forest Classifier with Intensive Optimized Pca Algorithm
Wild Ali, Alaeldeen Bader
WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 119 (04) : 3365 - 3382
[28] Prediction of Employee Turn Over Using Random Forest Classifier with Intensive Optimized Pca Algorithm
Alaeldeen Bader Wild Ali
Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, 119 : 3365 - 3382
[29] Prediction of the yield strength of as-cast alloys using the random forest algorithm
Zhang, Wei
Li, Peiyou
Wang, Lin
Fu, Xiaoling
Wan, Fangyi
Wang, Yongshan
Shu, Linsen
Yong, Long-quan
MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 38
[30] Sugarcane Yield Grade Prediction using Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Tree Techniques
Charoen-Ung, Phusanisa
Mittrapiyanuruk, Pradit
2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (JCSSE), 2018, : 244 - 249

← 1 2 3 4 5 →