Identification of effective factors to select energy recovery technologies from municipal solid waste using multi -criteria decision making (MCDM): A review of thermochemical technologies

被引:65
作者
Shahnazari, Arman [1 ]
Rafiee, Mahta [1 ]
Rohani, Abbas [1 ]
Nagar, Bharat Bhushan [2 ]
Ebrahiminik, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
Aghkhani, Mohammad Hossien [1 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] IPE Global Ltd Co, Waste Management Consulting Off, B-84,Def Colony, New Delhi 110024, India
关键词
Analytical hierarchical process; Thermochemical technology; TOPSIS; Municipal solid waste;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2020.100737
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Thermochemical technologies used to burn municipal solid waste are one of the relatively new and appropriate methods for waste management. By burning waste, heat and gases have arisen which can be used as the energy source to generate electricity. Due to the high cost, pollution emissions and diversity of such power plants, comprehensive studies are required. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the thermal methods in the field of waste management and to optimum for the most suitable methods. The selected thermochemical technologies include incineration, gasification, plasma, and pyrolysis. Data gathering was done through a questionnaire completed by experts. The decision -making models based on the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods are proposed to select the best thermochemical technology by the technical, economic, and environmental criteria. Ultimately, the environmental criteria (0.355), economic criteria (0.338) and, technical criteria (0.307) were introduced as the most effective criterion in choosing thermal methods respectively. The results of both AHP and TOPSIS models showed that the plasma method is the optimal thermochemical technology in terms of three existing criteria. Incinerator, gasification, and pyrolysis systems were ranked next.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Int J Sci Res
[2]   Multi-attribute decision-making approach for Aegle marmelos pyrolysis process using TOPSIS and Grey Relational Analysis: Assessment of engine emissions through novel Infrared thermography [J].
Baranitharan, P. ;
Ramesh, K. ;
Sakthivel, R. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 :315-328
[3]  
Biparva P, 2015, IRANIAN J ENERGY, V3
[4]  
Hrabovsky M., 2017, HDB THERMAL SCI ENG, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32003-8_32-1
[5]  
Hwang C. L., 1981, Multiple attribute decision making, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
[6]   Machine Learning-Enabled Competitive Grain Growth Behavior Study in Directed Energy Deposition Fabricated Ti6Al4V [J].
Li, Jinghao ;
Sage, Manuel ;
Guan, Xiaoyi ;
Brochu, Mathieu ;
Zhao, Yaoyao Fiona .
JOM, 2020, 72 (01) :458-464
[7]   Application of thermal plasma technology for the treatment of solid wastes in China: An overview [J].
Li, Jun ;
Liu, Kou ;
Yan, Shengjun ;
Li, Yaojian ;
Han, Dan .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 58 :260-269
[8]   A group decision making model based on an inconsistency index of interval multiplicative reciprocal matrices [J].
Liu, Fang ;
Yu, Qin ;
Pedrycz, Witold ;
Zhang, Wei-Guo .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 145 :67-76
[9]   Analysis of energy recovery potential using innovative technologies of waste gasification [J].
Lombardi, Lidia ;
Carnevale, Ennio ;
Corti, Andrea .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (04) :640-652
[10]  
Moharir M, 2019, ADV COMPUT ELECTR EN, P53, DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-6070-8.ch003