Fabrication of fixed implant prostheses using function bite impression technique (FBI technique)

被引:4
作者
Suzuki, Yasunori [1 ]
Shimpo, Hidemasa [2 ]
Ohkubo, Chikahiro [2 ]
Kurtz, Kenneth S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tsurumi Univ, Sch Dent Med, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2308501, Japan
[2] Tsurumi Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Removable Prosthodont, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2308501, Japan
[3] NYU, Coll Dent, Adv Educ Program Prosthodont, New York, NY 10003 USA
[4] NYU, Coll Dent, Int Program Prosthodont, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
FBI technique; Implant impression; Maxillomandibular registration; Functional generated path;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpor.2012.02.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Patient: The patient was partially edentulous, lacking both the first mandibular molars. The FBI and the conventional impression technique were used for the fabrication of implant-fixed prosthesis replacing the right and left molars, respectively. In the FBI technique, the definitive impression was made under occlusal force and functionally generated path (FGP) recording at the same time. The right and left occlusal contact areas were compared after completing the implant-fixed prosthesis rehabilitation. Discussion: It has been suggested that accuracy of the impression and maxillomandibular registration is necessary to ensure a satisfactory long-term clinical outcome. The transfer of the exact position of the implants to the working cast is even more important because implants lack the mobility of natural teeth. There are displacement differences between implants and natural teeth under occlusal force. The FBI technique may compensate for this difference in accuracy. Conclusion: Using the FBI technique, a precise prosthesis could be produced by completing simultaneously the maxillomandibular registration, impression and FGP. (C) 2012 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 296
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Abe M, 1983, DENT OUTLOOK, V62, P213
[2]  
Falk H, 1990, Swed Dent J Suppl, V69, P1
[3]  
HARALDSON T, 1988, SCAND J DENT RES, V96, P243
[4]   Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit [J].
Kan, JYK ;
Rungcharassaeng, K ;
Bohsali, K ;
Goodacre, CJ ;
Lang, BR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (01) :7-13
[5]  
Liou A D, 1993, Int J Prosthodont, V6, P377
[6]  
Matsushita K, 1982, J JPN PROSTHODONT SO, V26, P250
[7]  
Matsushita M, 1985, J JPN PROTHODONT SOC, V29, P1143
[8]   Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques [J].
Takahashi, T ;
Gunne, J .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (03) :256-260
[9]   Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions [J].
Vigolo, P ;
Majzoub, Z ;
Cordioli, G .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (02) :186-192
[10]  
Wei H, 2008, INT J PROSTHODONT, V21, P302