A Dispute Arbitration Protocol Based on a Peer-to-Peer Service Contract Management Scheme

被引:23
作者
Zou, Jun [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Orgun, Mehmet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Comp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB SERVICES (ICWS) | 2016年
关键词
Accountability; Blockchain; p2p; Arbitration;
D O I
10.1109/ICWS.2016.15
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Cloud computing has provided an attractive model for business service delivery. However, accountability aspects, mainly the monitoring of the execution of a service contract, liability assignment and dispute arbitration are still lacking. On the one hand, the traditional centralized monitoring and the trusted-third party (TTP) based arbitration solutions are not suitable for the distributed cloud environment. On the other hand, a decentralized solution also faces challenges in guaranteeing fairness, accuracy and sustainability. To address this issue, this paper firstly proposes an innovative service contract management scheme that facilitates the monitoring of the execution of a service contract in a peer-to-peer environment, inspired by the concept of blockchain in Bitcoin. Secondly, on top of the scheme it presents a novel dispute resolution protocol based on the Byzantine agreement and the commitment scheme. Thirdly, it identifies the optimal settings of the key parameters of the protocol through a set of experiments and scenario analysis, aiming to strike the balance of fairness, accuracy, incentive maximization for the honest arbiters and cost minimization for the overall arbitration process. With this approach, service participants can be held accountable in a truly distributed environment without the presence of a central authority, which increases businesses confidence on adopting cloud services.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, PEER TO PEER COMPUTI
  • [2] Antonopoulos A.M., 2015, MASTERING BITCOIN, V2nd
  • [3] Decentralization of governance and development
    Bardhan, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (04) : 185 - 205
  • [4] A FAIR PROTOCOL FOR SIGNING CONTRACTS
    BENOR, M
    GOLDREICH, O
    MICALI, S
    RIVEST, RL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1990, 36 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [5] Brown W.A., 2008, SOA governance: Achieving and sustaining business and IT agility
  • [6] Damevski K, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5544, P259
  • [7] Eckerson WW, 2010, Performance dashboards: measuring, monitoring, and managing your business
  • [8] Famaey Jeroen, 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems (AP2PS 2009), P27, DOI 10.1109/AP2PS.2009.12
  • [9] Farell Ryan., 2015, Wharton Research Scholars
  • [10] The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications
    Garay, Juan
    Kiayias, Aggelos
    Leonardos, Nikos
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2015, PT II, 2015, 9057 : 281 - 310