In silico tools used for compound selection during target-based drug discovery and development

被引:15
作者
Caldwell, Gary W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Janssen Res & Dev LLC, Discovery Sci, Spring House, PA 19002 USA
关键词
high-throughput screening; hit-to-lead; in silico tools; lead optimization; pharmaceutical crisis; target selection; target-based; TO-LEAD PROCESS; DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTIVITY; MEDICINAL CHEMISTS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; TOXICITY ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; MODELS; STRATEGIES; IMPACT; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1517/17460441.2015.1043885
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: The target-based drug discovery process, including target selection, screening, hit-to-lead (H2L) and lead optimization stage gates, is the most common approach used in drug development. The full integration of in vitro and/or in vivo data with in silico tools across the entire process would be beneficial to R&D productivity by developing effective selection criteria and drug-design optimization strategies. Areas covered: This review focuses on understanding the impact and extent in the past 5 years of in silico tools on the various stage gates of the target-based drug discovery approach. Expert opinion: There are a large number of in silico tools available for establishing selection criteria and drug-design optimization strategies in the target-based approach. However, the inconsistent use of in vitro and/or in vivo data integrated with predictive in silica multiparameter models throughout the process is contributing to R&D productivity issues. In particular, the lack of reliable in silico tools at the H2L stage gate is contributing to the suboptimal selection of viable lead compounds. It is suggested that further development of in silico multiparameter models and organizing biologists, medicinal and computational chemists into one team with a single accountable objective to expand the utilization of in silico tools in all phases of drug discovery would improve R&D productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 923
页数:23
相关论文
共 152 条
[31]  
Caldwell GW, 2012, CURR TOP MED CHEM, V12, P1282
[32]   ADME Optimization and Toxicity Assessment in Early- and Late-Phase Drug Discovery [J].
Caldwell, Gary W. ;
Yan, Zhengyin ;
Tang, Weimin ;
Dasgupta, Malini ;
Hasting, Becki .
CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 9 (11) :965-980
[33]  
Caldwell GW, 2006, CURR OPIN DRUG DISC, V9, P47
[34]  
Cheng FX, 2013, CURR TOP MED CHEM, V13, P1273
[35]   QSAR Modeling: Where Have You Been? Where Are You Going To? [J].
Cherkasov, Artem ;
Muratov, Eugene N. ;
Fourches, Denis ;
Varnek, Alexandre ;
Baskin, Igor I. ;
Cronin, Mark ;
Dearden, John ;
Gramatica, Paola ;
Martin, Yvonne C. ;
Todeschini, Roberto ;
Consonni, Viviana ;
Kuz'min, Victor E. ;
Cramer, Richard ;
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Yang, Chihae ;
Rathman, James ;
Terfloth, Lothar ;
Gasteiger, Johann ;
Richard, Ann ;
Tropsha, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 57 (12) :4977-5010
[36]   In Silico Prediction of Aqueous Solubility: A Multimodel Protocol Based on Chemical Similarity [J].
Chevillard, Florent ;
Lagorce, David ;
Reynes, Christelle ;
Villoutreix, Bruno O. ;
Vayer, Philippe ;
Miteva, Maria A. .
MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2012, 9 (11) :3127-3135
[37]   Identification and validation of bioactive small molecule target through phenotypic screening [J].
Cho, Yoon Sun ;
Kwon, Ho Jeong .
BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 20 (06) :1922-1928
[38]   Collaborative Pre-Competitive Preclinical Drug Discovery with Academics and Pharma/Biotech Partners at Sanford| Burnham: Infrastructure, Capabilities & Operational Models [J].
Chung, Thomas D. Y. .
COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY & HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING, 2014, 17 (03) :272-289
[39]   Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework [J].
Cook, David ;
Brown, Dearg ;
Alexander, Robert ;
March, Ruth ;
Morgan, Paul ;
Satterthwaite, Gemma ;
Pangalos, Menelas N. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2014, 13 (06) :419-431
[40]   The inevitable QSAR renaissance [J].
Cramer, Richard D. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2012, 26 (01) :35-38