Efficacy and safety of oral palonosetron compared with IV palonosetron administered with dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with solid tumors receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC)

被引:17
作者
Karthaus, Meinolf [1 ]
Tibor, Csoszi [2 ]
Lorusso, Vito [3 ]
Singh-Arora, Rajender [4 ,5 ]
Filippov, Alexander [6 ]
Rizzi, Giada [7 ]
Borroni, Maria Elisa [7 ]
Rossi, Giorgia [7 ]
Grunberg, Steven M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Neuperlach, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Munich, Germany
[2] G Hetenyi Hosp, Szolnok, Hungary
[3] Ist Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
[4] Sujan Surg Canc Hosp, Amravati, India
[5] Amravati Canc Fdn, Amravati, India
[6] MBUZ City Clin Hosp, Novosibirsk, Russia
[7] Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland
[8] Univ Vermont, Div Hematol Oncol, Burlington, VT USA
关键词
Palonosetron; Highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC); Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); Cisplatin; 5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHASE-III; ANTIEMETIC PROPHYLAXIS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CANCER PATIENTS; ONDANSETRON; EMESIS; APREPITANT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-015-2657-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of oral palonosetron with intravenous (IV) palonosetron for the prevention of cisplatin-related chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). A multinational, randomized, double-blind study enrolling adult chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant solid tumors scheduled to receive cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Patients received oral palonosetron (0.50 mg) or IV palonosetron (0.25 mg), each with oral dexamethasone. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority in terms of patients with a complete response (CR, no emesis/no rescue medication) within the acute phase (0-24 h after chemotherapy administration). Of the 743 patients randomized, 739 received study medications and 738 were included in the full analysis set. The CR rate in the acute phase was high for both groups (oral 89.4 %; IV 86.2 %). As this difference in proportions (stratum-adjusted Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method) was 3.21 % (99 % confidence interval (CI) -2.74 to 9.17 %), non-inferiority was demonstrated (since the lower limit of the 99 % CI was closer to zero than the predefined margin of 15 %). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to the study drug were rare (oral 3.2 %; IV 6.5 %). No TEAEs related to study drug leading to discontinuation were reported. Non-inferiority of oral versus IV palonosetron was demonstrated. The CR rate in the acute phase was > 86 % in both patient groups. The safety profiles were comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:2917 / 2923
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] Impact of initiating antiemetic prophylaxis with palonosetron versus ondansetron on risk of uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with lung cancer receiving multi-day chemotherapy
    Feinberg, Bruce
    Gilmore, James
    Haislip, Sally
    Jackson, James
    Jain, Gagan
    Balu, Sanjeev
    Buchner, Deborah
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (03) : 615 - 623
  • [12] Electrocardiographic findings of palonosetron in cancer patients
    Gonullu, Guzin
    Demircan, Sabri
    Demirag, Mustafa Kemal
    Erdem, Dilek
    Yucel, Idris
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (07) : 1435 - 1439
  • [13] Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron
    Gralla, R
    Lichinitser, M
    Van der Vegt, S
    Sleeboom, H
    Mezger, J
    Peschel, C
    Tonini, G
    Labianca, R
    Macciocchi, A
    Aapro, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (10) : 1570 - 1577
  • [14] Griffin AM, 1996, ANN ONCOL, V7, P189
  • [15] Aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron in the prevention of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-induced nausea and vomiting
    Hesketh, Paul J.
    Sanz-Altamira, Pedro
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (03) : 653 - 656
  • [16] EMESIS AS A CRITICAL PROBLEM IN CHEMOTHERAPY
    LASZLO, J
    LUCAS, VS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (16) : 948 - 949
  • [17] Combination of aprepitant, palonosetron and dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis in lung cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy
    Longo, F.
    Mansueto, G.
    Lapadula, V.
    Stumbo, L.
    Del Bene, G.
    Adua, D.
    De Filippis, L.
    Bonizzoni, E.
    Quadrini, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 66 (08) : 753 - 757
  • [18] Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients' daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall
    Martin, AR
    Pearson, JD
    Cai, B
    Elmer, M
    Horgan, K
    Lindley, C
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2003, 11 (08) : 522 - 527
  • [19] Navari Rudolph M, 2003, J Support Oncol, V1, P89
  • [20] Navari RM, 2010, FUTURE ONCOL, V6, P1073, DOI [10.2217/fon.10.74, 10.2217/FON.10.74]