Background aims. CD34(+) enrichment from cord blood units (CBU) is used increasingly in clinical applications involving ex vivo expansion. The CliniMACS instrument from Miltenyi Biotec is a current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) immunomagnetic selection system primarily designed for processing larger numbers of cells: a standard tubing set (TS) can process a maximum of 60 billion cells, while the larger capacity tubing set (LS) will handle 120 billion cells. In comparison, most CBU contain only 1-2 billion cells, raising a question regarding the optimal tubing set for CBU CD34(+) enrichment. We compared CD34(+) cell recovery and overall viability after CliniMACS processing of fresh CBU with either TS or LS. Methods. Forty-six freshly collected CBU (<= 36 h) were processed for CD34(+) enrichment; 22 consecutive units were selected using TS and a subsequent 24 processed with LS. Cell counts and immunophenotyping were performed pre- and post-selection to assess total nucleated cells (TNC), viability and CD34(+) cell content. Results. Two-sample t-tests of mean CD34(+) recovery and viability revealed significant differences in favor of LS (CD34(+) recovery, LS = 56%, TS = 45%, P = 0.003; viability, LS = 74%, TS = 59%, P = 0.011). Stepwise linear regression, considering pre-processing unit age, viability, TNC and CD34+ purity, demonstrated statistically significant correlations only with the tubing set used and age of unit. Conclusions. For CD34(+) enrichment from fresh CBU, LS provided higher post-selection viability and more efficient recovery. In this case, a lower maximum TNC specification of TS was not predictive of better performance. The same may hold for smaller scale enrichment of other cell types with the CliniMACS instrument.