Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Evaluation (GONE) Project: The Effect of Monoscopic Versus Stereoscopic Viewing Conditions on Optic Nerve Evaluation

被引:51
作者
Chan, Helen H. L. [1 ]
Ong, Dai Ni [1 ]
Kong, Yu Xiang G. [1 ]
O'Neill, Evelyn C. [1 ,3 ]
Pandav, Surinder S. [2 ]
Coote, Michael A. [1 ]
Crowston, Jonathan G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Ctr Eye Res Australia, East Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Adv Eye Ctr, Chandigarh 160012, India
[3] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Dublin 7, Ireland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
AGREEMENT; DISC; CUP; OPHTHALMOLOGISTS; ACCURACY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.024
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether monoscopic vs stereoscopic viewing impacts evaluation of optic disc photographs for glaucoma diagnosis in an expert population. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: Twenty pairs of high-quality monoscopic and stereoscopic photographs of similar size and magnification (ie, 40 images), were selected to demonstrate a range of optic disc features from a total of 197 eyes of 197 patients with glaucoma and normal subjects recruited from a tertiary clinic. These were presented in randomized order via an interactive platform (http://stereo.gone-project.com/). Participants assessed 9 topographic features and estimated glaucoma likelihood for each photograph. Main outcome measures were intra- and inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: There was good intra-observer agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic assessments of glaucoma likelihood (kappa(w) = 0.56). There was also good to substantial agreement for peripapillary atrophy (kappa(w) = 0.65), cup shape (kappa(w) = 0.65), retinal nerve fiber layer loss (kappa(w) = 0.69), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (kappa(w) = 0.58), and disc shape (kappa(w) = 0.57). However, intra-observer agreement was only fair to moderate for disc tilt, cup depth, and disc size (kappa(w) = 0.46-0.49). Inter-observer agreement for glaucoma likelihood in monoscopic photographs (kappa(w) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-0.67) was substantial and not lower than in stereoscopic photographs (kappa(w) = 0.59, CI = 0.54-0.65). Monoscopic photographs did not lead to lower levels of inter-observer agreement compared to stereoscopic photographs in the assessment of any optic disc characteristics, for example disc size (mono kappa(w) = 0.65, stereo kappa(w) = 0.52) and cup-to-disc ratio (mono kappa(w) = 0.72, stereo kappa(w) = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: For expert observers in the evaluation of optic disc photographs for glaucoma likelihood, monoscopic optic disc photographs did not appear to represent a significant disadvantage compared to stereoscopic photographs. (C) 2014 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 944
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ABRAMS LS, 1994, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V101, P1662
[2]   Agreement and Accuracy of Non-Expert Ophthalmologists in Assessing Glaucomatous Changes in Serial Stereo Optic Disc Photographs [J].
Breusegem, Christophe ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
Stalmans, Ingeborg ;
Zeyen, Thierry .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) :742-746
[3]  
Gaasterland D E, 2001, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V99, P177
[4]  
Gaasterland D.E., 2001, T AM OPHTHAL SOC, V99, P184
[5]   Observer experience and Cup:Disc ratio assessment [J].
Hanson, S ;
Krishnan, SK ;
Phillips, J .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2001, 78 (10) :701-705
[6]  
Hodapp E, 1993, MOSBY INCORPORATED
[7]   Agreement Among Glaucoma Specialists in Assessing Progressive Disc Changes From Photographs in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients [J].
Jampel, Henry D. ;
Friedman, David ;
Quigley, Harry ;
Vitale, Susan ;
Miller, Rhonda ;
Knezevich, Frederick ;
Ding, Yulan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 147 (01) :39-44
[8]   Diagnosis and pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy: Morphological aspects [J].
Jonas, JB ;
Budde, WM .
PROGRESS IN RETINAL AND EYE RESEARCH, 2000, 19 (01) :1-40
[9]  
JONAS JB, 1988, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V29, P1151
[10]   Pharmacological mydriasis and optic disc examination [J].
Kirwan, JF ;
Gouws, P ;
Linnell, AET ;
Crowston, J ;
Bunce, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (08) :894-898