Clinical impact of boost irradiation to pelvic lymph node in uterine cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

被引:30
作者
Choi, Kyu Hye [1 ]
Kim, Ji Yoon [1 ]
Lee, Dong Soo [2 ]
Lee, Yun Hee [3 ]
Lee, Sea-Won [1 ]
Sung, SooYoon [1 ]
Park, Hee Hyun [1 ]
Yoon, Sei-Chul [4 ]
Hur, Soo Young [5 ]
Park, Jong-Sup [5 ]
Kim, Yeon Sil [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Coll Med, Gyeongsang Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinju Si, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
boost irradiation; cervix cancer; chemoradiotherapy; pelvic lymph node; radiotherapy dosage; EXTENDED-FIELD IRRADIATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; STAGE-IB; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; NORMAL TISSUE; CARCINOMA; HYSTERECTOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; TOLERANCE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000010517
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to analyze tumor control and clinical outcomes of patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy according to pelvic lymph node (PLN) positivity and boost irradiation to PLN and to determine toxicities associated with boost irradiation. We retrospectively reviewed patients with uterine cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy between March 2000 and April 2015. Clinical characteristics, failure pattern, and survival outcomes of patients with or without PLN metastasis and those with or without boost irradiation were analyzed. A total of 80 cases were PLN-negative and 46 were PLN-positive. A total of 11 patients underwent PLN boost irradiation. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates showed significant difference between the PLN-positive and PLN-negative groups (P=.010). The 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates showed significant difference between the 2 groups (P=.032). The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the no-boost irradiation group were 82.9% and 58.3%, respectively, whereas all patients in the boost irradiation group were alive at the time of analysis (P=.065). There was no recurrence in the boost irradiation group. The difference in PFS was significant between the boost and the no-boost irradiation groups (P=.023). The 2-year and 5-year pelvic-recurrence free survival (PRFS) did not show significant difference but the tendency of increased risk of pelvic recurrence in no-boost group (boost vs no-boost; 81.9% and 70.2% vs 100% and 100% in 2-year and 5-year PRFS, respectively, P=.156). Boost irradiation to PLN could improve locoregional control especially in large pelvic LN (1.5cm). Our results showed that only 1 acute and late toxicity of higher than grade 3 occurred. PLN metastasis was significant prognostic factor in cervix cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy. In the boost irradiation group, there was no recurrence or death with significantly better PFS. Boost irradiation to PLN is expected to improve locoregional control, but further follow-up and assessment are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer [J].
Ariga, Takuro ;
Toita, Takafumi ;
Kasuya, Goro ;
Nagai, Yutaka ;
Inamine, Morihiko ;
Kudaka, Wataru ;
Kakinohana, Yasumasa ;
Aoki, Youichi ;
Murayama, Sadayuki .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (04) :690-696
[2]   Long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients with cervical carcinoma: a retrospective study [J].
Atahan, I. L. ;
Onal, C. ;
Ozyar, E. ;
Yiliz, F. ;
Selek, U. ;
Kose, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2007, 17 (04) :833-842
[3]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[4]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[5]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[6]   Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Dikshit, Rajesh ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Rebelo, Marise ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell ;
Forman, David ;
Bray, Freddie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) :E359-E386
[7]   ACR APPROPRIATENESS CRITERIA® ON ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER EXPERT PANEL ON RADIATION ONCOLOGY-GYNECOLOGY [J].
Gaffney, David K. ;
Erickson-Wittmann, Beth A. ;
Jhingran, Anuja ;
Mayr, Nina A. ;
Puthawala, Ajmel A. ;
Moore, David ;
Rao, Gautam G. ;
Small, William, Jr. ;
Varia, Mahesh A. ;
Wolfson, Aaron H. ;
Yashar, Catheryn M. ;
Yuh, William ;
Cardenes, Higinia Rosa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (03) :609-614
[8]   THE IMPORTANCE OF PARAMETRIAL LYMPH-NODES IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL-CANCER [J].
GIRARDI, F ;
LICHTENEGGER, W ;
TAMUSSINO, K ;
HAAS, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 34 (02) :206-211
[9]   Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix - art. no. CD00225.pub2 [J].
Green, J ;
Kirwan, J ;
Tierney, J ;
Vale, C ;
Symonds, P ;
Fresco, L ;
Williams, C ;
Collingwood, M .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (03)
[10]   Lymph node control in cervical cancer [J].
Grigsby, PW ;
Singh, AK ;
Siegel, BA ;
Dehdashti, F ;
Rader, J ;
Zoberi, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (03) :706-712