Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN(R)) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects

被引:467
|
作者
Heijl, L
Heden, G
Svardstrom, G
Ostgren, A
机构
[1] STP PERIODONTOL, KARLSTAD, SWEDEN
[2] STP PERIODONTOL, UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[3] STP PERIODONTOL, FALUN, SWEDEN
关键词
enamel proteins; periodontal regeneration; intrabony defects; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00253.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the present clinical trial was to compare the long-term effect of EMDOGAIN(R) treatment as an adjunct to modified widman flap (MWF) surgery with the effect of MWF and placebo treatment. The investigation was a placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter trial involving 33 subjects with 34 paired test and control sites. The protocol required 2 interproximal sites, appropriately separated, in the same jaw with probing pocket depths greater than or equal to 6 mm and an associated intrabony defect with a depth of greater than or equal to 4 mm and a width of greater than or equal to 2 mm as measured on a radiograph. Only predominantly 1- and 2-wall defects were included, Clinical attachment gain and radiographic bone gain were used as primary outcome variables. Assessments were made at baseline, 8, 16 and 36 months. Mean values for clinical attachment level gain in test and control sites at 8 months were 2.1 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively; at 16 months, 2.3 mm and 1.7 mm, respectively; and at 36 months 2.2 mm and 1.7 mm, respectively; and the differences were statistically significantly different at each time point (p<0.01). The radiographic bone level continued to increase over the 36 months at the EMDOGAIN(R)-treated sites, while it remained close to the baseline level al the control sites. The statistically significant (p<0.001) radiographic bone gain at 36 months of 2.6 mm at EMDOGAIN(R)-treated sites corresponded to 36% gain of initial bone loss or 66% defect fill. The present trial has demonstrated that topical application of EMDOGAIN onto diseased root surfaces associated with intrabony defects during MWF periodontal surgery will promote an increased gain of radiographic bone and clinical attachment compared to control (placebo application) surgery in the same patient, There was no evidence to indicate any clinical adverse effects from application of EMDOGAIN(R) conjunction with periodontal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 714
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative in Periodontal Regeneration Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
    Diaz-Arocutipa, Carlos
    Barja-Ore, John
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2023, 14 (04) : 249 - +
  • [32] Clinical evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and enamel matrix derivative versus enamel matrix derivative alone for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans
    Gurinsky, BS
    Mills, MP
    Mellonig, JT
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (10) : 1309 - 1318
  • [33] The flapless approach with and without enamel matrix derivatives for the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Aimetti, Mario
    Stasikelyte, Morta
    Mariani, Giulia Maria
    Cricenti, Luca
    Baima, Giacomo
    Romano, Federica
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2024, 51 (09) : 1112 - 1121
  • [34] Treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration and enamel-matrix-proteins - An experimental study in monkeys
    Sculean, A
    Donos, N
    Brecx, M
    Reich, E
    Karring, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 27 (07) : 466 - 472
  • [35] Three-year results following regenerative periodontal surgery of advanced intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative alone or combined with a synthetic bone graft
    Hoffmann, Thomas
    Al-Machot, Elyan
    Meyle, Joerg
    Jervoe-Storm, Pia-Merete
    Jepsen, Soren
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (02) : 357 - 364
  • [36] Three-year results following regenerative periodontal surgery of advanced intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative alone or combined with a synthetic bone graft
    Thomas Hoffmann
    Elyan Al-Machot
    Jörg Meyle
    Pia-Merete Jervøe-Storm
    Søren Jepsen
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 : 357 - 364
  • [37] Baseline radiographic defect angle of the intrabony defect as a prognostic indicator in regenerative periodontal surgery with enamel matrix derivative
    Tsitoura, E
    Tucker, R
    Suvan, J
    Laurell, L
    Cortellini, P
    Tonetti, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (08) : 643 - 647
  • [38] The effect of postsurgical antibiotics on the healing of intrabony defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins
    Sculean, A
    Blaes, A
    Arweiler, N
    Reich, E
    Donos, N
    Brecx, M
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (02) : 190 - 195
  • [39] DENTAL ROOT SURFACE TREATMENT WITH ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID DOES NOT IMPROVE ENAMEL MATRIX DERIVATIVE PEPTIDE TREATMENT WITHIN INTRABONY DEFECTS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Bertoldi, C.
    Labriola, A.
    Generali, L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2019, 33 (06) : 1945 - 1947
  • [40] Combination of Enamel Matrix Derivatives with Bone Graft vs Bone Graft Alone in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony and Furcation Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fidana, Ibrahim
    Labreucheb, Julien
    Huck, Olivier
    Agossad, Kevimy
    ORAL HEALTH & PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 22 (01) : 655 - 664