Mortality reductions due to mammography screening: Contemporary population-based data

被引:23
|
作者
Hanley, James A. [1 ]
Hannigan, Ailish [2 ]
O'Brien, Katie M. [3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Limerick, Grad Entry Med Sch, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Natl Canc Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 12期
关键词
BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY; NORWAY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0188947
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Our objective was to compare breast cancer mortality in two regions of the Republic of Ireland that introduced a screening programme eight years apart, and to estimate the steady-state mortality deficits the programme will produce. We carried out age-and year-matched between-region comparison of breast cancer mortality rates, and of incidence rates of stage 2-4 breast cancer, in the eligible cohorts. The regions comprised counties that, beginning in early 2000 (region 1) and late 2007 (region 2), invited women aged 50-64 to biennial mammography screening. The data were supplied by the National Cancer Registry, Central Statistics Office. As impact measures, we used age-and-year-matched mortality (from breast cancers diagnosed from 2000 onwards), rate ratios and incidence rate ratios in the compared regions from 2000 to 2013. Ratios were adjusted for between-region differences in background rates. In cohorts too old to be invited, death rates in regions 1 and 2 were 702 per 0.91 and 727 per 0.90 million women-years respectively (Ratio 0.96). In the eligible cohorts, they were 1027 per 2.9 and 1095 per 2.67 (Ratio 0.88). Thus, rates in cohorts that could have benefitted were 9% lower in region 1 than region 2: (95% CI: -20%, +4%). The incidence rates of stage 2-4 breast cancer were 7% lower in region 2 than region 1 over the entire 14 year period, and 20% lower in 2007, i.e., before the screening in region 2 began to narrow the difference. Since mortality reductions due to screening only manifest after several years, the full impact of screening has not yet been realized in region 1. The lower rate observed in that region is a conservative estimate of the steady state benefit. Additional deaths would have been averted had screening continued beyond age 64.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An image quality review programme in a population-based mammography screening service
    Galli, Vania
    Pini, Monica
    De Metrio, Daniele
    de Bianchi, Priscilla Sassoli
    Bucchi, Lauro
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (03) : 253 - 259
  • [32] Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gullien, Randi
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Ekseth, Ulrika
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Izadi, Mina
    Jebsen, Ingvild N.
    Jahr, Gunnar
    Krager, Mona
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Gur, David
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [33] Overdiagnosis among women attending a population-based mammography screening program
    Falk, Ragnhild Sorum
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Skaane, Per
    Haldorsen, Tor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 133 (03) : 705 - 712
  • [34] Societal costs and effects of implementing population-based mammography screening in Greenland
    Christensen, Maria Klitgaard
    Niclasen, Birgit V.
    Iburg, Kim Moesgaard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2017, 76
  • [35] Association of symptoms and breast cancer in population-based mammography screening in Finland
    Rosenberg, R. D.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2015, 26 (03): : 217 - 217
  • [36] Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program
    Théberge, I
    Hébert-Croteau, N
    Langlois, A
    Major, D
    Brisson, J
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [37] Overdiagnosis and overtreatment associated with breast cancer mammography screening: A simulation study with calibration to population-based data
    Seigneurin, Arnaud
    Labarere, Joee
    Francois, Olivier
    Exbrayat, Catherine
    Dupouy, Maylis
    Filippi, Marc
    Colonna, Marc
    BREAST, 2016, 28 : 60 - 66
  • [38] Effect of population-based screening on breast cancer mortality
    Bock, Karin
    Borisch, Bettina
    Cawson, Jenny
    Damtjernhaug, Berit
    de Wolf, Chris
    Dean, Peter
    den Heeten, Ard
    Doyle, Gregory
    Fox, Rosemary
    Frigerio, Alfonso
    Gilbert, Fiona
    Hecht, Gerold
    Heindel, Walter
    Heywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia Helen
    Holland, Roland
    Jones, Fran
    Lernevall, Anders
    Madai, Silvia
    Mairs, Adrian
    Muller, Jennifer
    Nisbet, Patric
    O'Doherty, Ann
    Patnick, Julietta
    Perry, Nick
    Regitz-Jedermann, Lisa
    Rickard, Mary
    Rodrigues, Vitor
    Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
    Scharpantgen, Astrid
    Schwartz, Walter
    Seradour, Brigitte
    Skaane, Per
    Tabar, Laszlo
    Tornberg, Sven
    Ursin, Giske
    Van Limbergen, Erik
    Vandenbroucke, Anne
    Warren, Linda J.
    Warwick, Lee
    Yaffe, Martin
    Zappa, Marco
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9805): : 1775 - 1776
  • [39] Effect of population-based screening on breast cancer mortality
    Riva, Catherine
    Biollaz, Jerome
    Foucras, Philippe
    Junod, Bernard
    Nicot, Philippe
    Spinosa, Jean-Pierre
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9823): : 1296 - 1296
  • [40] The effect of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities on breast cancer mortality: 20 years of follow-up
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
    Looman, Caspar W. N.
    van Luijt, Paula A.
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 141 (04) : 671 - 677