Efficacy of doxorubicin as an induction agent for cats with lymphosarcoma

被引:25
作者
Peaston, AE [1 ]
Maddison, JE
机构
[1] Sydney Childrens Hosp, Childrens Canc Res Inst, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Dept Pharmacol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
cat; feline; lymphosarcoma; chemotherapy; doxorubicin;
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb12087.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the efficacy of doxorubicin when used alone in inducing remission in cats with lymphosarcoma. Design Prospective multi-institutional study of naturally occurring disease, Methods Cases were accrued from veterinary institutions in Australia and New Zealand after obtaining consent from informed owners. Cats were treated with doxorubicin every 3 weeks for three treatments. If there was no response to the first dose of doxorubicin or if the cat relapsed during the doxorubicin regimen, the cat was withdrawn from the trial and either euthanased or treated with other agents. Age, breed, gender and anatomic site of the lymphosarcoma (multicentric, alimentary, mediastinal, extranodal) were recorded for each cat. Clinical remission was assessed before each treatment by physical examination, radiography, ultrasonography and computed tomography where appropriate. Complete remission was defined as the disappearance of all clinical signs and clinically detectable tumour. Results Twenty-one cases were accrued over a 2-year-period but only 19 were available for data analysis. Young Siamese cats were over-represented and all cats with mediastinal tumours were young Siamese. There was a significant difference between the mean ages of cats with mediastinal or multicentric lymphosarcoma (mean +/- SD: 3.5 +/- 3.0 and 4.3 +/- 2.6 years, respectively) and cats with alimentary or extranodal LSA (11.4 +/- 0.9 and 11.0 +/- 0.9 years, respectively). Of 19 cats treated with doxorubicin alone, 6 (32%) had complete remission, 6 (32%) had partial remission and 7 (36%) did not respond. Conclusions The results suggest that doxorubicin cannot be recommended as a single agent for treatment of feline lymphosarcoma because of the rather poor remission rate achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 444
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] CANFIELD PJ, 1996, CLIN MORPHOLOGICAL I, P1
  • [2] CARTER RF, 1987, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V23, P587
  • [3] COTTER SM, 1983, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V19, P166
  • [4] Retrospective study of 60 cases of feline lymphosarcoma
    Court, EA
    Watson, ADJ
    Peaston, AE
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1997, 75 (06) : 424 - 427
  • [5] FELINE IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS - PREVALENCE, DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS AND ISOLATION
    FRIEND, S
    BIRCH, CJ
    LORDING, PM
    MARSHALL, JA
    STUDDERT, MJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1990, 67 (07) : 237 - 243
  • [6] IS MAINTENANCE CHEMOTHERAPY APPROPRIATE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CANINE MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMA
    HAHN, KA
    RICHARDSON, RC
    TECLAW, RF
    CLINE, JM
    CARLTON, WW
    DENICOLA, DB
    BONNEY, PL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 6 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [7] MADDISON JE, 1994, AUST VET PRACT, V24, P94
  • [8] Mahony OM, 1995, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V207, P1593
  • [9] Prevalences of feline leukaemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats in Sydney
    Malik, R
    Kendall, K
    Cridland, J
    Coulston, S
    Stuart, AJ
    Snow, D
    Love, DN
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1997, 75 (05) : 323 - &
  • [10] MOONEY SC, 1989, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V194, P696