Breast MR imaging for cancer detection and implant evaluation potential pitfalls

被引:8
作者
Piccoli, CW [1 ]
Greer, JG [1 ]
Mitchell, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV HOSP,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19107
关键词
breast; prostheses; breast neoplasms; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.16.1.63
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast is currently used for evaluation of both parenchymal disease and silicone gel implants. MR imaging has the potential to address questions raised or unanswered with traditional diagnostic imaging methods. However, lesion specificity and cancer sensitivity depend on multiple technical factors (ie, imaging parameters and contrast agent delivery) and biologic factors (ie, the menstrual status of the patient and the vascularity of the lesion), Although diagnostic criteria for parenchymal disease have been reported, overlap of malignant and benign enhancement profiles occurs, The accuracy of implant evaluation depends on the imaging parameters and knowledge of the implant type and surgical history, In addition, individual investigative imaging methods are diverse, causing difficulty in protocol development for the practicing radiologist. An awareness of the problematic factors in breast MR imaging will improve diagnostic accuracy and allow understanding of the limitations of the modality and individual patient examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 75
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer
    Girardi, V.
    Carbognin, G.
    Camera, L.
    Baglio, I.
    Bucci, A.
    Bonetti, F.
    Mucelli, R. Pozzi
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2011, 116 (08): : 1226 - 1238
  • [22] Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions
    Wiberg, MK
    Aspelin, P
    Perbeck, L
    Boné, B
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2002, 43 (03) : 275 - 281
  • [23] MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy
    Viehweg P.
    Rotter K.
    Laniado M.
    Lampe D.
    Buchmann J.
    Kölbl H.
    Heywang-Köbrunner S.
    European Radiology, 2004, 14 (3) : 402 - 408
  • [24] MR imaging of response to primary chemo-brachytherapy in BCT-inoperable breast cancer.
    Hlawatsch, A
    Kuner, RP
    Teifke, A
    Hoffmann, G
    Zamboglou, N
    Thelen, M
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (01): : 31 - 37
  • [25] Gold nanoparticles in breast cancer treatment: Promise and potential pitfalls
    Lee, Jihyoun
    Chatterjee, Dev Kumar
    Lee, Min Hyuk
    Krishnan, Sunil
    CANCER LETTERS, 2014, 347 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [26] Intraoperative Supine Breast MR Imaging to Quantify Tumor Deformation and Detection of Residual Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results
    Gombos, Eva C.
    Jayender, Jagadeesan
    Richman, Danielle M.
    Caragacianu, Diana L.
    Mallory, Melissa A.
    Jolesz, Ferenc A.
    Golshan, Mehra
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (03) : 720 - 729
  • [27] STAGING OF SUSPECTED BREAST-CANCER - EFFECT OF MR-IMAGING AND MR-GUIDED BIOPSY
    OREL, SG
    SCHNALL, MD
    POWELL, CM
    HOCHMAN, MG
    SOLIN, LJ
    FOWBLE, BL
    TOROSIAN, MH
    ROSATO, EF
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [28] MR-IMAGING OF BREAST IMPLANTS
    DEANGELIS, GA
    DELANGE, EE
    MILLER, LR
    MORGAN, RF
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1994, 14 (04) : 783 - 794
  • [29] Variants and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of Shoulder Injuries
    Al-Riyami, Abeer Mohamed
    Lim, Boon Keat
    Peh, Wilfred C. G.
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 18 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [30] SILICONE BREAST IMPLANT RUPTURES IN AN ANIMAL-MODEL - COMPARISON OF MAMMOGRAPHY, MR-IMAGING, US, AND CT
    GORCZYCA, DP
    DEBRUHL, ND
    AHN, CY
    HOYT, A
    SAYRE, JW
    NUDELL, PP
    MCCOMBS, M
    SHAW, WW
    BASSETT, LW
    RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) : 227 - 232