Volume Perimetry: Measurement in Depth of Visual Field Loss

被引:10
|
作者
Satgunam, PremNandhini
Apfelbaum, Henry L.
Peli, Eli [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Schepens Eye Res Inst, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
visual field defects; vision impairment; hemianopia; functional vision; bitemporal; binasal; EYES;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182678df8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. Volume scotomas are three-dimensional regions of space that are not visible to the observer. Volume perimetry maps volume scotomas. Volume scotomas predicted from combining monocular visual fields assume known fixation locus (mainly foveal). However, fixation loci are not always known, especially with central field loss (CFL). Here we demonstrate methods for measuring and calculating volume scotomas and discuss their practical implications. Methods. Three patients (bitemporal hemianopia, binasal scotoma, and CFL) were evaluated. Slices through the volume scotomas were measured at three distances: at the plane of fixation, at a plane anterior to fixation (representing anterior volume perimetry), and at a plane posterior to fixation (representing posterior volume perimetry). For anterior volume perimetry, patients fixated on a screen 100 cm away through a beamsplitter that reflected the perimetric stimulus (at 50 cm). For posterior volume perimetry, patients fixated on a near target (50 cm), while perimetric stimuli were presented on a screen 150 cm beyond fixation. At the plane of fixation, monocular visual fields under binocular viewing conditions were measured using a computerized dichoptic perimeter. Results. Posterior and anterior volume scotomas were documented in patients with bitemporal hemianopia and binasal scotomas, respectively. The CFL patient demonstrated both anterior and posterior volume scotomas. Scotoma magnitude was considered to determine its effect on visual function. Conclusions. Direct measurement of volume scotomas can be performed. Anterior and posterior volume visual fields can vary substantially from conventional binocular perimetry measured at the fixation plane, revealing blind areas not otherwise identified. These volume scotomas are likely to impair functional vision such as driving (for bitemporal hemianopes) and near work with small hand tools (for binasal scotomas). Patients with CFL will have impaired functional vision for both distance and near tasks. Consideration of volume scotomas can help provide more effective vision rehabilitation and counseling. (Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:E1265-E1275)
引用
收藏
页码:E1265 / E1275
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual Function-Specific Perimetry to Identify Glaucomatous Visual Loss Using Three Different Definitions of Visual Field Abnormality
    Tafreshi, Ali
    Sample, Pamela A.
    Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
    Girkin, Christopher A.
    Zangwill, Linda M.
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Lalezary, Maziar
    Racette, Lyne
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (03) : 1234 - 1240
  • [2] The nasal circling phenomenon pattern of visual field loss on automated static perimetry - Implications on the neuroanatomy of the optic chiasm
    Johnson, LN
    Yee, W
    Colapinto, EV
    NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 21 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [3] Population receptive field analysis of the primary visual cortex complements perimetry in patients with homonymous visual field defects
    Papanikolaou, Amalia
    Keliris, Georgios A.
    Papageorgiou, Dorina
    Shao, Yibin
    Krapp, Elke
    Papageorgiou, Eleni
    Stingl, Katarina
    Bruckmann, Anna
    Schiefer, Ulrich
    Logothetis, Nikos K.
    Smirnakis, Stelios M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (16) : E1656 - E1665
  • [4] Correlation of pattern of visual field loss by perimetry and anterior chamber angle parameters by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in primary angle-closure glaucoma
    Palanisamy, Sreeramyaa
    Raja, Vidya
    Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A.
    Mani, Iswarya
    Krishnadas, R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (08) : 2895 - 2901
  • [5] THE ACCURACY OF CONFRONTATION VISUAL-FIELD TEST IN COMPARISON WITH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY
    JOHNSON, LN
    BALOH, FG
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 83 (10) : 895 - 898
  • [6] Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry
    Sihota, Ramanjit
    Gupta, Viney
    Tuli, Deven
    Sharma, Ajay
    Sony, Parul
    Srinivasan, Geetha
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (01) : 146 - 152
  • [7] Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry
    Cai, Yuqing
    Strauch, Christoph
    van der Stigchel, Stefan
    Ten Brink, Antonia F.
    Cornelissen, Frans W.
    Naber, Marnix
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025,
  • [8] Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong, KCS
    Byles, DB
    Constable, PH
    EYE, 2003, 17 (03) : 330 - 333
  • [9] Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    K C S Fong
    D B Byles
    P H Constable
    Eye, 2003, 17 : 330 - 333
  • [10] Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: A review and practical implications
    Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
    Nassiri, Nariman
    Giangiacomo, Annette
    Caprioli, Joseph
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 249 (11) : 1593 - 1616