Application of tomosynthesis for vertebral compression fracture diagnosis and bone healing assessment in fracture liaison services

被引:3
作者
Chen, Hsuan-Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Tuoh [3 ,4 ]
Tseng, Sheng-Pin [5 ]
Lin, Chia-Yu [5 ]
Chen, Chih-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tze-Hong [3 ]
Wei, Yuh-Fen [6 ]
Chen, Ya-Fang [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hsin Chu Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Biol Sci & Technol, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[5] Atom Energy Council, Inst Nucl Energy Res, Hlth Phys Div, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hsin Chu Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
tomosynthesis; vertebral compression fractures; osteoporosis; precision; fracture liaison service; cost-effective; DIGITAL TOMOSYNTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.910130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Early identification of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) is crucial for successful secondary fracture prevention. Tomosynthesis, a low-dose tomographic imaging technique, may facilitate the evaluation and long-term follow-up of VCFs in patients with osteoporosis. Herein, we compared the performances of plain radiography and tomosynthesis for VCF diagnosis and healing assessment in patients enrolled in fracture liaison services in our hospital. Forty-nine patients with new VCFs at the T10-L5 levels were prospectively recruited between August 2018 and May 2020; all patients underwent thoracolumbar plain radiography and tomosynthesis. We evaluated the accuracy of the VCF diagnosis, image quality, and VCFs healing process. Tomosynthesis identified 90 levels of VCF in 49 patients, while plain radiography revealed only 87.8% (79/90) of them. There were 44.9% (22/49) patients with neglected chronic VCFs as seen on tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis images had improved VCF diagnostic accuracy up to 12.2% and showed significantly more anatomic details than plain radiography. For diagnosis of VCFs, the performance of plain radiographs was poorer than that of tomosynthesis images (plain radiographs: sensitivity 84%, specificity 93.5%, false positive rate 6.5%, and false negative rate 16%; tomosynthesis: sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 100%, false positive rate 0%, and false negative 6.8%), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as gold standard. The Kappa coefficient between Tomosynthesis and MRI is 0.956 while between radiography and MRI is 0.704. Tomosynthesis showed significantly more anatomic details than plain radiography and all the examiners revealed a clear preference for tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis scored 3.3 times higher on the fracture healing assessment at the 3-month follow-up than plain radiographs. Tomosynthesis is a promising tool for VCF screening and diagnosis in patients with osteoporosis and for monitoring fracture healing status at a low radiation dose and cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Definition and diagnosis of vertebral fracture [J].
ONeill, TW ;
Silman, AJ .
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1997, 24 (06) :1208-1211
[42]   Role of Fracture Liaison Service Program in Reducing Refracture Rate in the Elderly Osteoporotic Trauma Patients Presenting With Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Six-Year Study [J].
Kelm, Noah ;
Wasfie, Tarik ;
Volk, Max ;
Walker, Zach ;
Galovska, Stephanija ;
Brock, Cara ;
Jackson, Avery .
AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (04) :784-788
[43]   Implementing and running a fracture liaison service: An integrated clinical service providing a comprehensive bone health assessment at the point of fracture management [J].
Clunie, Gavin ;
Stephenson, Sonya .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2008, 12 (3-4) :156-162
[44]   Integration of a vertebral fracture identification service into a fracture liaison service: a quality improvement project [J].
Ong, T. ;
Copeland, R. ;
Thiam, C. N. ;
Cerda Mas, G. ;
Marshall, L. ;
Sahota, O. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 32 (05) :921-926
[45]   Integration of a vertebral fracture identification service into a fracture liaison service: a quality improvement project [J].
T. Ong ;
R. Copeland ;
C.N. Thiam ;
G. Cerda Mas ;
L. Marshall ;
O. Sahota .
Osteoporosis International, 2021, 32 :921-926
[46]   Vertebral fracture assessment: Enhancing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis [J].
Zeytinoglu, Meltem ;
Jain, Rajesh K. ;
Vokes, Tamara J. .
BONE, 2017, 104 :54-65
[47]   Development of fracture liaison services: What have we learned? [J].
Shipman, Kate E. ;
Doyle, Alison ;
Arden, Hilary ;
Jones, Tim ;
Gittoes, Neil J. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 :S4-S9
[48]   The first reported fracture liaison service (FLS) for vertebral fractures in China: is muscle the missing gap? [J].
Wong, Ronald Man Yeung ;
Ko, Shaau Yiu ;
Chau, Wai-Wang ;
Lee, Linus Chee Yeen ;
Chow, Simon Kwoon Ho ;
Cheung, Wing Hoi ;
Law, Sheung Wai .
ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2021, 16 (01)
[49]   Physical performance and sarcopenia assessment in patients with a recent fracture visiting the Fracture Liaison Service [J].
Schene, M. R. ;
Willems, H. C. ;
Driessen, J. H. M. ;
Vranken, L. ;
Heersprink, F. O. Lambers ;
Janzing, H. M. J. ;
van der Velde, R. Y. ;
van den Bergh, J. P. ;
Wyers, C. E. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 35 (05) :851-862
[50]   Vertebral Fracture Assessment in Acromegaly [J].
Madeira, Miguel ;
Neto, Leonardo Vieira ;
Torres, Carolina Hammes ;
Carvalho de Mendonca, Laura Maria ;
Gadelha, Monica Roberto ;
Fleiuss de Farias, Maria Lucia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2013, 16 (02) :238-243