Application of tomosynthesis for vertebral compression fracture diagnosis and bone healing assessment in fracture liaison services

被引:3
作者
Chen, Hsuan-Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Tuoh [3 ,4 ]
Tseng, Sheng-Pin [5 ]
Lin, Chia-Yu [5 ]
Chen, Chih-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tze-Hong [3 ]
Wei, Yuh-Fen [6 ]
Chen, Ya-Fang [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hsin Chu Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Biol Sci & Technol, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[5] Atom Energy Council, Inst Nucl Energy Res, Hlth Phys Div, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hsin Chu Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
tomosynthesis; vertebral compression fractures; osteoporosis; precision; fracture liaison service; cost-effective; DIGITAL TOMOSYNTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.910130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Early identification of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) is crucial for successful secondary fracture prevention. Tomosynthesis, a low-dose tomographic imaging technique, may facilitate the evaluation and long-term follow-up of VCFs in patients with osteoporosis. Herein, we compared the performances of plain radiography and tomosynthesis for VCF diagnosis and healing assessment in patients enrolled in fracture liaison services in our hospital. Forty-nine patients with new VCFs at the T10-L5 levels were prospectively recruited between August 2018 and May 2020; all patients underwent thoracolumbar plain radiography and tomosynthesis. We evaluated the accuracy of the VCF diagnosis, image quality, and VCFs healing process. Tomosynthesis identified 90 levels of VCF in 49 patients, while plain radiography revealed only 87.8% (79/90) of them. There were 44.9% (22/49) patients with neglected chronic VCFs as seen on tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis images had improved VCF diagnostic accuracy up to 12.2% and showed significantly more anatomic details than plain radiography. For diagnosis of VCFs, the performance of plain radiographs was poorer than that of tomosynthesis images (plain radiographs: sensitivity 84%, specificity 93.5%, false positive rate 6.5%, and false negative rate 16%; tomosynthesis: sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 100%, false positive rate 0%, and false negative 6.8%), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as gold standard. The Kappa coefficient between Tomosynthesis and MRI is 0.956 while between radiography and MRI is 0.704. Tomosynthesis showed significantly more anatomic details than plain radiography and all the examiners revealed a clear preference for tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis scored 3.3 times higher on the fracture healing assessment at the 3-month follow-up than plain radiographs. Tomosynthesis is a promising tool for VCF screening and diagnosis in patients with osteoporosis and for monitoring fracture healing status at a low radiation dose and cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Utility of vertebral biopsy before vertebroplasty in patients with diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture [J].
Carlo Sozzi ;
Mirko Trentadue ;
Lisa Nicolì ;
Federica Tavani ;
Enrico Piovan .
La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 :956-962
[22]   Effectiveness of fracture liaison services in osteoporosis [J].
Paccou, Julien ;
Philippoteaux, Cecile ;
Cortet, Bernard ;
Fardellone, Patrice .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2023, 90 (05)
[23]   Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom [J].
Paul J. Mitchell .
Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2013, 11 :377-384
[24]   Establishment of fracture liaison services in Germany [J].
Hesse, Eric ;
Boecker, Wolfgang ;
Kammerlander, Christian ;
Stumpf, Ulla ;
Weber, Ingrid ;
Maus, Uwe .
UNFALLCHIRURG, 2019, 122 (10) :766-770
[25]   The Effectiveness of Fracture Liaison Services in Improving Fragility Fracture Outcomes [J].
Nitasha Khullar ;
Maria I. Danila .
Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology, 2022, 8 :19-35
[26]   Best Practices in Secondary Fracture Prevention: Fracture Liaison Services [J].
Paul J. Mitchell .
Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2013, 11 :52-60
[27]   Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom [J].
Mitchell, Paul J. .
CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2013, 11 (04) :377-384
[28]   The Effectiveness of Fracture Liaison Services in Improving Fragility Fracture Outcomes [J].
Khullar, Nitasha ;
Danila, Maria I. .
CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 8 (02) :19-35
[29]   Best Practices in Secondary Fracture Prevention: Fracture Liaison Services [J].
Mitchell, Paul J. .
CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2013, 11 (01) :52-60
[30]   Functional outcomes following hip fracture with concurrent vertebral fracture within a fracture liaison service [J].
Phruetthiphat, Ong-art ;
Kanokwongnuwat, Wasin ;
Satravaha, Yodhathai ;
Pinijprapa, Panukorn ;
Chaichankul, Chaisiri ;
Gajaseni, Pawin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01)