Application of tomosynthesis for vertebral compression fracture diagnosis and bone healing assessment in fracture liaison services

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Hsuan-Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Tuoh [3 ,4 ]
Tseng, Sheng-Pin [5 ]
Lin, Chia-Yu [5 ]
Chen, Chih-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tze-Hong [3 ]
Wei, Yuh-Fen [6 ]
Chen, Ya-Fang [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hsin Chu Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Biol Sci & Technol, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[5] Atom Energy Council, Inst Nucl Energy Res, Hlth Phys Div, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Hsin Chu Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
tomosynthesis; vertebral compression fractures; osteoporosis; precision; fracture liaison service; cost-effective; DIGITAL TOMOSYNTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.910130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Early identification of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) is crucial for successful secondary fracture prevention. Tomosynthesis, a low-dose tomographic imaging technique, may facilitate the evaluation and long-term follow-up of VCFs in patients with osteoporosis. Herein, we compared the performances of plain radiography and tomosynthesis for VCF diagnosis and healing assessment in patients enrolled in fracture liaison services in our hospital. Forty-nine patients with new VCFs at the T10-L5 levels were prospectively recruited between August 2018 and May 2020; all patients underwent thoracolumbar plain radiography and tomosynthesis. We evaluated the accuracy of the VCF diagnosis, image quality, and VCFs healing process. Tomosynthesis identified 90 levels of VCF in 49 patients, while plain radiography revealed only 87.8% (79/90) of them. There were 44.9% (22/49) patients with neglected chronic VCFs as seen on tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis images had improved VCF diagnostic accuracy up to 12.2% and showed significantly more anatomic details than plain radiography. For diagnosis of VCFs, the performance of plain radiographs was poorer than that of tomosynthesis images (plain radiographs: sensitivity 84%, specificity 93.5%, false positive rate 6.5%, and false negative rate 16%; tomosynthesis: sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 100%, false positive rate 0%, and false negative 6.8%), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as gold standard. The Kappa coefficient between Tomosynthesis and MRI is 0.956 while between radiography and MRI is 0.704. Tomosynthesis showed significantly more anatomic details than plain radiography and all the examiners revealed a clear preference for tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis scored 3.3 times higher on the fracture healing assessment at the 3-month follow-up than plain radiographs. Tomosynthesis is a promising tool for VCF screening and diagnosis in patients with osteoporosis and for monitoring fracture healing status at a low radiation dose and cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services
    Lems, W. F.
    Paccou, J.
    Zhang, J.
    Fuggle, N. R.
    Chandran, M.
    Harvey, N. C.
    Cooper, C.
    Javaid, K.
    Ferrari, S.
    Akesson, K. E.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 32 (03) : 399 - 411
  • [2] Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services
    W. F. Lems
    J. Paccou
    J. Zhang
    N. R. Fuggle
    M. Chandran
    N. C. Harvey
    C. Cooper
    K. Javaid
    S. Ferrari
    K. E. Akesson
    Osteoporosis International, 2021, 32 : 399 - 411
  • [3] Diagnosis and Management of Vertebral Compression Fracture
    Alsoof, Daniel
    Anderson, George
    McDonald, Christopher L.
    Basques, Bryce
    Kuris, Eren
    Daniels, Alan H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 135 (07) : 815 - 821
  • [4] Fracture Liaison Services
    Briot, Karine
    CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 29 (04) : 416 - 421
  • [5] Should vertebral fracture assessment be performed in Fracture Liaison Service patients with non-vertebral fracture?
    Binkley, N.
    Schousboe, J. T.
    Lix, L. M.
    Morin, S. N.
    Leslie, W. D.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 34 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [6] Should vertebral fracture assessment be performed in Fracture Liaison Service patients with non-vertebral fracture?
    N. Binkley
    J. T. Schousboe
    L. M. Lix
    S. N. Morin
    W. D. Leslie
    Osteoporosis International, 2023, 34 : 129 - 135
  • [7] Simple transpedicular vertebral biopsy for diagnosis of malignancy in vertebral compression fracture
    Chou, Kuan-Nien
    Lin, Bon-Jour
    Chien, Ling-Yu
    Tsai, Wen-Chiuan
    Ma, Hsin-I
    Hueng, Dueng-Yuan
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2013, 61 (06) : 587 - 592
  • [8] Bone densitometry in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures in children:: Accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment
    Mayranpaa, Mervi K.
    Helenius, Ilkka
    Valta, Helena
    Mayranpaa, Mikko I.
    Toiviainen-Salo, Sanna
    Makitie, Outi
    BONE, 2007, 41 (03) : 353 - 359
  • [9] Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment
    Damiano, Joel
    Kolta, Sami
    Porcher, Raphael
    Tournoux, Caroline
    Dougados, Maxime
    Roux, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2006, 9 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [10] Fracture liaison services: do they reduce fracture rates?
    de Bruin, Irma J. A.
    Wyers, Caroline E.
    van den Bergh, Joop P. W.
    Geusens, Piet P. M. M.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE, 2017, 9 (07) : 157 - 164