Persistence, Spatial Distribution and Implications for Progression Detection of Blind Parts of the Visual Field in Glaucoma: A Clinical Cohort Study

被引:16
作者
Montolio, Francisco G. Junoy [1 ]
Wesselink, Christiaan [1 ]
Jansonius, Nomdo M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Ophthalmol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
STANDARD AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; SITA STANDARD; THRESHOLD PERIMETRY; SUSPECT GLAUCOMA; FULL-THRESHOLD; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; MANIFEST; VARIABILITY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0041211
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Visual field testing is an essential part of glaucoma care. It is hampered by variability related to the disease itself, response errors and fatigue. In glaucoma, blind parts of the visual field contribute to the diagnosis but - once established - not to progression detection; they only increase testing time. The aims of this study were to describe the persistence and spatial distribution of blind test locations in standard automated perimetry in glaucoma and to explore how the omission of presumed blind test locations would affect progression detection. Methodology/Principal Findings: Data from 221 eyes of 221 patients from a cohort study with the Humphrey Field Analyzer with 30-2 grid were used. Patients were stratified according to baseline mean deviation (MD) in six strata of 5 dB width each. For one, two, three and four consecutive <0 dB sensitivities in the same test location in a series of baseline tests, the median probabilities to observe <0 dB again in the concerning test location in a follow-up test were 76, 86, 88 and 90%, respectively. For <10 dB, the probabilities were 88, 95, 97 and 98%, respectively. Median (interquartile range) percentages of test locations with three consecutive <0 dB sensitivities were 0(0-0), 0(0-2), 4(0-9), 17(8-27), 27(20-40) and 60(50-70)% for the six MD strata. Similar percentages were found for a subset of test locations within 10 degree eccentricity (P>0.1 for all strata). Omitting test locations with three consecutive <0 dB sensitivities at baseline did not affect the performance of the MD-based Nonparametric Progression Analysis progression detection algorithm. Conclusions/Significance: Test locations that have been shown to be reproducibly blind tend to display a reasonable blindness persistence and do no longer contribute to progression detection. There is no clinically useful universal MD cut-off value beyond which testing can be limited to 10 degree eccentricity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser
    Heeg, GP
    Blanksma, LJ
    Hardus, PLLJ
    Jansonius, NM
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 83 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [12] Initial Arcuate Defects within the Central 10 Degrees in Glaucoma
    Hood, Donald C.
    Raza, Ali S.
    de Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V.
    Odel, Jeffrey G.
    Greenstein, Vivienne C.
    Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
    Ritch, Robert
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (02) : 940 - 946
  • [13] HUDSON C, 1994, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V35, P268
  • [14] Bayes' theorem applied to perimetric progression detection in glaucoma: from specificity to positive predictive value
    Jansonius, NM
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (05) : 433 - 437
  • [15] Early manifest glaucoma trial -: Design and baseline data
    Leske, MC
    Heijl, A
    Hyman, L
    Bengtsson, B
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (11) : 2144 - 2153
  • [16] Comparison of the New Perimetric GATE Strategy with Conventional Full-Threshold and SITA Standard Strategies
    Schiefer, Ulrich
    Pascual, John P.
    Edmunds, Beth
    Feudner, Elisabeth
    Hoffmann, Esther M.
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Lagreze, Wolf A.
    Pfeiffer, Norbert
    Sample, Pamela A.
    Staubach, Flemming
    Weleber, Richard G.
    Vonthein, Reinhard
    Krapp, Elke
    Paetzold, Jens
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (01) : 488 - 494
  • [17] Spatial Pattern of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Obtained with Regionally Condensed Stimulus Arrangements
    Schiefer, Ulrich
    Papageorgiou, Eleni
    Sample, Pamela A.
    Pascual, John P.
    Selig, Bettina
    Krapp, Elke
    Paetzold, Jens
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (11) : 5685 - 5689
  • [18] Responses of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells to Perimetric Stimuli
    Swanson, William H.
    Sun, Hao
    Lee, Barry B.
    Cao, Dingcai
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (02) : 764 - 771
  • [19] Retesting visual fields: Utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma
    Turpin, Andrew
    Jankovic, Darko
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2007, 48 (04) : 1627 - 1634
  • [20] What's new in perimetry
    Wall, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 24 (01) : 46 - 55