Persistence, Spatial Distribution and Implications for Progression Detection of Blind Parts of the Visual Field in Glaucoma: A Clinical Cohort Study

被引:16
作者
Montolio, Francisco G. Junoy [1 ]
Wesselink, Christiaan [1 ]
Jansonius, Nomdo M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Ophthalmol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
STANDARD AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; SITA STANDARD; THRESHOLD PERIMETRY; SUSPECT GLAUCOMA; FULL-THRESHOLD; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; MANIFEST; VARIABILITY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0041211
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Visual field testing is an essential part of glaucoma care. It is hampered by variability related to the disease itself, response errors and fatigue. In glaucoma, blind parts of the visual field contribute to the diagnosis but - once established - not to progression detection; they only increase testing time. The aims of this study were to describe the persistence and spatial distribution of blind test locations in standard automated perimetry in glaucoma and to explore how the omission of presumed blind test locations would affect progression detection. Methodology/Principal Findings: Data from 221 eyes of 221 patients from a cohort study with the Humphrey Field Analyzer with 30-2 grid were used. Patients were stratified according to baseline mean deviation (MD) in six strata of 5 dB width each. For one, two, three and four consecutive <0 dB sensitivities in the same test location in a series of baseline tests, the median probabilities to observe <0 dB again in the concerning test location in a follow-up test were 76, 86, 88 and 90%, respectively. For <10 dB, the probabilities were 88, 95, 97 and 98%, respectively. Median (interquartile range) percentages of test locations with three consecutive <0 dB sensitivities were 0(0-0), 0(0-2), 4(0-9), 17(8-27), 27(20-40) and 60(50-70)% for the six MD strata. Similar percentages were found for a subset of test locations within 10 degree eccentricity (P>0.1 for all strata). Omitting test locations with three consecutive <0 dB sensitivities at baseline did not affect the performance of the MD-based Nonparametric Progression Analysis progression detection algorithm. Conclusions/Significance: Test locations that have been shown to be reproducibly blind tend to display a reasonable blindness persistence and do no longer contribute to progression detection. There is no clinically useful universal MD cut-off value beyond which testing can be limited to 10 degree eccentricity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Artes PH, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P2654
  • [2] Bengtsson B, 1997, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V75, P184
  • [3] SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma
    Bengtsson, B
    Heijl, A
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 76 (04): : 431 - 437
  • [4] Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma
    Bengtsson, B
    Heijl, A
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 76 (03): : 268 - 272
  • [5] Bengtsson B, 1997, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V75, P368
  • [6] Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects
    Budenz, DL
    Rhee, P
    Feuer, WJ
    McSoley, J
    Johnson, CA
    Anderson, DR
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (06) : 1052 - 1058
  • [7] CHAUHAN BC, 1993, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V34, P3534
  • [8] Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals
    de Tarso Ponte Pierre-Filho, Paulo
    Schimiti, Rui Barroso
    Cabral de Vasconcellos, Jose Paulo
    Costa, Vital Paulino
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 84 (03): : 345 - 350
  • [9] Automated perimetry - A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
    Delgado, MF
    Nguyen, NTA
    Cox, TA
    Singh, K
    Lee, DA
    Dueker, DK
    Fechtner, RD
    Juzych, MS
    Lin, SC
    Netland, PA
    Pastor, SA
    Schuman, JS
    Samples, JR
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (12) : 2362 - 2374
  • [10] SOME ASPECTS OF AUTOMATION OF PERIMETRY
    FANKHAUSER, F
    SPAHR, J
    BEBIE, H
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1977, 22 (02) : 131 - 141