Wastewater treatment using oxygenic photogranule-based process has lower environmental impact than conventional activated sludge process

被引:44
作者
Brockmann, Doris [1 ,2 ]
Gerand, Yves [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Park, Chul [4 ]
Milferstedt, Kim [3 ]
Helias, Arnaud [2 ,5 ,7 ]
Hamelin, Jerome [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Bio2E, 102 Ave Etangs, F-11100 Narbonne, France
[2] ELSA Res Grp, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, INRAE, LBE, Narbonne, France
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[5] Univ Montpellier, INRAE, LBE, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
[6] EVEA, Lyon, France
[7] Univ Montpellier, INRAE, ITAP, Montpellier, France
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Oxygenic photogranules; Life cycle assessment; Cyanobacteria; Anaerobic digestion; Granular biomass; TREATMENT PLANTS; MICROALGAE; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124204
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to assess the environmental feasibility of a novel wastewater treatment technology based on oxygenic photogranules (OPG) biomass in comparison to a conventional activated sludge (CAS) system. LCA using laboratory scale experimental data allowed for eco-design of the process during the early stage of process development at laboratory scale. Electricity consumption related to artificial lighting, the fate of the generated biomass (renewable energy and replacement of mineral fertilizer), and the nitrogen flows in the OPG system were identified as major contributors to the potential environmental impact of the OPG treatment system. These factors require optimization in order to reduce the environmental impact of the overall OPG system. Nonetheless, the environmental impact of a non-optimized OPG scenario was generally lower than for a CAS reference system. With an optimization of the artificial lighting system, an energy neutral treatment system may be within reach.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Estimating anaerobic biodegradability indicators for waste activated sludge [J].
Mottet, Alexis ;
Francois, Emilie ;
Latrille, Eric ;
Steyer, Jean Philippe ;
Deleris, Stephane ;
Vedrenne, Fabien ;
Carrere, Helene .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2010, 160 (02) :488-496
[32]   Environmental assessment of different advanced oxidation processes applied to a bleaching Kraft mill effluent [J].
Muñoz, I ;
Rieradevall, J ;
Torrades, F ;
Peral, J ;
Domènech, X .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2006, 62 (01) :9-16
[33]   Wirelessly powered submerged-light illuminated photobioreactors for efficient microalgae cultivation [J].
Murray, Alexandra Marie ;
Fotidis, Ioannis A. ;
Isenschmid, Alex ;
Haxthausen, Karl Rasmus August ;
Angelidaki, Irini .
ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2017, 25 :244-251
[34]   Benchmarks for the energy demand of nutrient removal plants [J].
Nowak, O .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (12) :125-132
[35]  
Park C., 2015, WAT ENV FED RES BIOS
[36]  
Park C, 2015, Patent Cooperation Treaty, Patent No. [WO2015112654 A2, 2015112654]
[37]   LCA as a Decision Support Tool for the Environmental Improvement of the Operation of a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant [J].
Pasqualino, Jorgelina C. ;
Meneses, Montse ;
Abella, Montserrat ;
Castells, Francesc .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (09) :3300-3307
[38]   Microalgal-bacterial aggregates: Applications and perspectives for wastewater treatment [J].
Quijano, Guillermo ;
Arcila, Juan S. ;
Buitron, German .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2017, 35 (06) :772-781
[39]  
Rittmann B.E., 2020, Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications
[40]   Energy positive domestic wastewater treatment: the roles of anaerobic and phototrophic technologies [J].
Shoener, B. D. ;
Bradley, I. M. ;
Cusick, R. D. ;
Guest, J. S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2014, 16 (06) :1204-1222