High stability multi-objective decision-making approach of dry hobbing parameters

被引:5
|
作者
Cao, Weidong [1 ]
Yu, Yang [2 ]
Li, Jia [1 ]
Wu, Dianjian [3 ]
Ni, Jianjun [1 ]
Chen, Xingzheng [4 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Internet Things Engn, Changzhou 213022, Peoples R China
[2] China Inst Marine Technol & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Technol, Agr Machinery Engn Res & Design Inst, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ, Coll Engn & Technol, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
High-speed dry hobbing; Process parameters; Machining energy consumption; Multi -objective decision; Multi -objective Runge Kutta optimizer; Analytic Hierarchy Process; CUTTING PARAMETERS; POWER-CONSUMPTION; HIERARCHY PROCESS; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.077
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
High-speed dry hobbing is an advanced and green manufacturing technology. The use of intelligent algorithm for process parameter decision-making is receiving more and more attention in dry hobbing. The process parameter results of each operation of these methods are inconsistent, that is, the numerical fluctuation of results. To resolve this problem, a multi-objective decision-making approach of process parameters is proposed for highspeed dry hobbing based on K-means clustering, multi-objective Runge Kutta optimizer (MORUN) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). First, based on the past process cases of dry hobbing, K-means clustering is used to determine the cluster centers and case clusters. For the problem of dry hobbing process parameters to be decided, the distance from each cluster center is calculated and the similar case clusters are found. The numerical range of process parameters is determined. Then, based on the well-established machining parameters model of dry hobbing with the optimization objectives of machining energy consumption, quality and time, MORUN is developed and used to find the optimized process parameters. Finally, regarding the users' emphasis on objectives, AHP is used to sort all the optimized process parameters obtained, and the first ranked process parameter is used for machining. The feasibility of the proposed approach is verified by the actual hobbing. Compared with other well-established methods, the proposed approach can effectively solve the problem of numerical fluctuation of optimization results, has high stability, and select the optimal term from several optimization process parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1195
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-objective collaborative decision-making for flood resource utilization in a reservoir
    Wan, Xinyu
    Xue, Yuting
    Hua, Lijuan
    Wu, Qingyang
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (12) : 4629 - 4640
  • [22] A multi-objective decision-making model for water and sediment in regulation a reservoir
    Peng, Y
    Zhang, HW
    Li, YT
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RIVER SEDIMENTATION, VOLS 1-4, 2004, : 1003 - 1008
  • [23] A Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Machining Processes Using Data Clustering and Multi-Objective Optimization
    Hegab, Hussien
    Salem, Amr
    Taha, Hussein A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [24] Multi-objective decision-making and combination evaluation of green manufacturing enterprises
    Wang Xianlin
    Zhang Hua
    Song Jiajia
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 631 - 634
  • [25] Multi-objective decision-making model for distribution planning of goods and routing of vehicles in emergency multi-objective decision-making model for distribution planning of goods and routing of vehicles in emergency
    Zahedi, Abdolhamid
    Kargari, Mehrdad
    Kashan, Ali Husseinzadeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 48
  • [26] Multi-objective CNC gear hobbing parameters optimization model for high efficiency and energy saving
    Li C.
    Fu S.
    Chen X.
    Ji Q.
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2020, 26 (03): : 676 - 687
  • [27] Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm and Preference Multi-Objective Decision-Making Based on Artificial Intelligence Biological Immune System
    Bao, Juan
    Liu, Xiangyang
    Xiang, Zhengtao
    Wei, Gang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 160221 - 160230
  • [28] Novel Multi-objective Decision-Making and Trade-Off Approach for Selecting Optimal Machining Parameters of Inconel-800 Superalloy
    Hussain, Syed Abou Iltaf
    Sen, Binayak
    Das Gupta, Archisman
    Mandal, Uttam Kumar
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 45 (07) : 5833 - 5847
  • [29] A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Neural Network: Effective Structure and Learning Method
    Yan, Shu-Rong
    Nadershahi, Mohadeseh
    Guo, Wei
    Ghaderpour, Ebrahim
    Mohammadzadeh, Ardashir
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2025, 37 (4-5)
  • [30] Multi-Objective Decision-Making Meets Dynamic Shortest Path: Challenges and Prospects
    da Silva, Juarez Machado
    Ramos, Gabriel de Oliveira
    Barbosa, Jorge Luis Victoria
    ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (03)