A profitability analysis of small-scale plants for biomethane injection into the gas grid

被引:61
作者
Cucchiella, Federica [1 ]
D'Adamo, Idiano [1 ]
Gastaldi, Massimo [1 ]
Miliacca, Michela [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Dept Ind & Informat Engn & Econ, Via G Gronchi 18, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Enterprise Engn, Via Politecn 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词
Biomethane; Economic analysis; Small-scale plants; Subsidies; Sustainability; BIOGAS UPGRADING TECHNOLOGIES; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; NATURAL-GAS; PROCESS SIMULATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; FUEL; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.243
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biomethane is a promising renewable energy carrier with the potential to diversify and decarbonise natural gas. It is produced from a range of waste sources and can be distributed into the natural gas grid or used as a vehicle fuel or converted into in cogeneration units. The economic evaluation of small plants for biomethane injection into the gas grid is not well defined in literature. This paper proposes a mathematical and economic model useful to evaluate the profitability of these plants in according to Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. The indicators used are Net Present Value (NPV), Discounted Payback Time (DPBT), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Profitability Index (PI). The baseline case studies analyse three different small-scale sizes (50 m(3)/h,100 m(3)/h and 150 m(3)/h) concerning two typologies of substrates (organic fraction of municipal solid waste (ofmsw) and a mixture of maize and manure residues). Results define that the profitability is verified only for 150 m(3)/h ofmsw plant in baseline case study (NPV is 615,694, DPBT is 3 y, IRR is 33% and PI is 0.18). Furthermore, alternative case studies are conducted on the main critical variables (subsidies, investment costs of biogas production, transport costs of substrates and percentage of maintenance and overhead costs in biogas production). The economic feasibility can be reached in the following case studies: 100 m(3)/h ofmsw plant in sensitivity analysis, 50 m(3)/h ofmsw plant in scenario analysis, 150 m(3)/h mixed plant in scenario analysis with a new incentive scheme and 100 m(3)/h manure residues plant in scenario analysis. The biomethane can contribute to develop the circular economy recovering a wide range of waste. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm? [J].
Geissdoerfer, Martin ;
Savaget, Paulo ;
Bocken, Nancy M. P. ;
Hultink, Erik Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :757-768
[22]  
Graf F., 2015, 26 WORLD GAS C PAR
[23]   Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development [J].
Grando, Rafaela Lora ;
de Souza Antune, Adelaide Maria ;
da Fonseca, Fabiana Valeria ;
Sanchez, Antoni ;
Barrena, Raquel ;
Font, Xavier .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 :44-53
[24]   Opportunities and challenges: Landfill gas to biomethane injection into natural gas distribution grid through pipeline [J].
Hoo, Poh Ying ;
Hashim, Haslenda ;
Ho, Wai Shin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 :409-419
[25]   How to decarbonize the natural gas sector: A dynamic simulation approach for the market development estimation of renewable gas in Germany [J].
Horschig, Thomas ;
Adams, P. W. R. ;
Gawel, Erik ;
Thraen, Daniela .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 213 :555-572
[26]  
IRENA, 2017, BIOG ROAD VEH TECHN
[27]   Comparison of biogas production from an advanced micro-bio-loop and conventional system [J].
Jin, Qiang ;
Yang, Yan ;
Li, Aimin ;
Liu, Fuqiang ;
Shan, Aidang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 148 :245-253
[28]   Dynamic biogas upgrading based on the Sabatier process: Thermodynamic and dynamic process simulation [J].
Juergensen, Lars ;
Ehimen, Ehiaze Augustine ;
Born, Jens ;
Holm-Nielsen, Jens Bo .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 178 :323-329
[29]   Biogas as a renewable energy fuel - A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage [J].
Khan, Imran Ullah ;
Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan ;
Hashim, Haslenda ;
Matsuura, Takeshi ;
Ismail, A. F. ;
Rezaei-DashtArzhandi, M. ;
Azelee, I. Wan .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 150 :277-294
[30]   Upgraded biogas for transport in Sweden - effects of policy instruments on production, infrastructure deployment and vehicle sales [J].
Larsson, Marten ;
Gronkvist, Stefan ;
Alvfors, Per .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :3774-3784