Promoting elementary students' epistemology of science through computer-supported knowledge-building discourse and epistemic reflection

被引:33
作者
Lin, Feng [1 ]
Chan, Carol K. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Ctr Educ Res, 1025 West Johnson St,Room 665, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Scientific epistemology; theory-building; knowledge-building discourse; science learning; SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS; INQUIRY; BELIEFS; VIEWS; CONSTRUCTION; CONCEPTIONS; EXPLICIT;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2018.1435923
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined the role of computer-supported knowledge-building discourse and epistemic reflection in promoting elementary-school students' scientific epistemology and science learning. The participants were 39 Grade 5 students who were collectively pursuing ideas and inquiry for knowledge advance using Knowledge Forum (KF) while studying a unit on electricity; they also reflected on the epistemic nature of their discourse. A comparison class of 22 students, taught by the same teacher, studied the same unit using the school's established scientific investigation method. We hypothesised that engaging students in idea-driven and theory-building discourse, as well as scaffolding them to reflect on the epistemic nature of their discourse, would help them understand their own scientific collaborative discourse as a theory-building process, and therefore understand scientific inquiry as an idea-driven and theory-building process. As hypothesised, we found that students engaged in knowledge-building discourse and reflection outperformed comparison students in scientific epistemology and science learning, and that students' understanding of collaborative discourse predicted their post-test scientific epistemology and science learning. To further understand the epistemic change process among knowledge-building students, we analysed their KF discourse to understand whether and how their epistemic practice had changed after epistemic reflection. The implications on ways of promoting epistemic change are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 687
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Akerson VL, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CAN J LEARN TECHNOL, DOI DOI 10.21432/T2GP4R
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ED TECHNOLOGY ENCY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Sci. Educ, DOI [10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0, DOI 10.1007/S11191-004-5157-0]
[6]  
Bendixen L.D., 2016, Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, P281
[7]   IMPLICATIONS OF POSTMODERNISM FOR SCIENCE, OR, SCIENCE AS PROGRESSIVE DISCOURSE [J].
BEREITER, C .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 29 (01) :3-12
[8]  
Bereiter C., 2016, 12 INT C LEARN SCI S
[9]  
Brownlee J., 2016, Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, P300
[10]   AN EXPERIMENT IS WHEN YOU TRY IT AND SEE IF IT WORKS - A STUDY OF GRADE-7 STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE [J].
CAREY, S ;
EVANS, R ;
HONDA, M ;
JAY, E ;
UNGER, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1989, 11 (05) :514-529