Prehospital identification of major trauma patients

被引:20
作者
Ocak, Gurbey [1 ]
Sturms, Leontien M. [2 ]
Hoogeveen, Josephine M. [3 ]
Le Cessie, Saskia [4 ]
Jukema, Gerrolt N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Trauma Ctr W Netherlands, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Trauma Surg, Med Ctr, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Stat, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Multiple trauma; Triage; Trauma centers; Europe; FIELD TRIAGE GUIDELINES; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; INJURY SEVERITY; MECHANISM; SCORE; CARE; PERSONNEL; CRITERIA; OUTCOMES; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-008-0340-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Prehospital triage is aimed at getting the right patient to the right hospital. Evaluations on the performance of prehospital triage tools are scarce. This study examines the ability of the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) triage guidelines to identify major trauma patients in a European trauma system. Furthermore, this study evaluates the predictive power of other prehospital measurements. Prehospital data of 151 minor (Injury Severity Score (ISS) 1-15) and 151 major trauma patients, (ISS > 15) treated at a Dutch trauma center, were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of major trauma patients. The major trauma patients particularly incurred severe head injuries (45.7%) and severe thorax injuries (21.9%). The ACSCOT guidelines had a sensitivity of 84.1% and a specificity of 77.5%. A new prehospital trauma triage model was constructed including nine predictors of major trauma. This model identified more major trauma patients than the ACSCOT (sensitivity 92.1%, p = 0.023) and resulted in a comparable specificity (79.5%; p = 0.711). The new triage model outperforms the ACSCOT triage guidelines in identifying major trauma patients in the prehospital setting. The new triage guidelines may improve patient outcomes but needs to be validated in a prospective study.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
*AG POL DGU, 2003, JAHR 2002 TRAUM AG P
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EUR J TRAUMA
[3]  
Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 1998, ABBREVIATED INJURY S
[4]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[5]  
Batchelor JS., 2000, Trauma, V2, P253, DOI [10.1177/146040860000200402, DOI 10.1177/146040860000200402]
[6]  
COOPER ME, 1995, AM SURGEON, V61, P363
[7]   Prehospital prediction of intensive care unit stay and mortality in blunt trauma patients [J].
Gabbe, BJ ;
Cameron, PA ;
Woe, R ;
Sinymn, P ;
Sinith, KL ;
McNeil, JJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (02) :456-463
[8]   Trauma triage: A comparison of CRAMS and TRTS in a UK population [J].
Gray, A ;
Goyder, EC ;
Goodacre, SW ;
Johnson, GS .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1997, 28 (02) :97-101
[9]   The trauma centre: Now and in the future [J].
Haas, NP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (05) :627-630
[10]   Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project [J].
Holbrook, TL ;
Anderson, JP ;
Sieber, WJ ;
Browner, D ;
Hoyt, DB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1999, 46 (05) :765-771