Targeting conservation payments to achieve multiple outcomes

被引:23
作者
Hajkowicz, Stefan [1 ]
Higgins, Andrew [1 ]
Miller, Craig [1 ]
Marinoni, Oswald [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
关键词
Conservation planning and markets; Multiple criteria analysis; Optimisation; Biodiversity protection; Economics;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.028
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This paper describes an environmental conservation planning model used in Queensland, Australia to purchase agreements on 66 sites covering 81,046 ha at a cost of A$1.9 million. The model was used as part of a competitive tendering program called "NatureAssist". The model maximises conservation benefit subject to a cost constraint using binary combinatorial optimisation. Multiple criteria analysis (MCA) is used to capture investor preferences and measure benefit over multiple outcomes. Conservation costs are drawn from real market data; i.e. the prices being offered by sellers (landholders) to supply conservation services to a buyer (the government). This study shows the potential strengths, and weaknesses, of taking an MCA approach to select conservation sites in a real market context. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2368 / 2375
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Case study:: Application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply [J].
Abrishamchi, A ;
Ebrahimian, A ;
Tajrishi, M ;
Mariño, MA .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (04) :326-335
[2]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MARXAN VERSION 1 8 3
[4]  
*AUSTR GOV, 2007, 2 AUSTR GOV
[5]  
Ballestero E, 2002, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V65, P411, DOI [10.1016/S0301-4797(02)90564-5, 10.1006/jema.2002.0564]
[6]   Accounting for management costs in sensitivity analyses of matrix population models [J].
Baxter, Peter W. J. ;
McCarthy, Michael A. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. ;
Menkhorst, Peter W. ;
McLean, Natasha .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :893-905
[7]   A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty [J].
Bender, MJ ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :35-44
[8]   Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter? [J].
Carwardine, J. ;
Rochester, W. A. ;
Richardson, K. S. ;
Williams, K. J. ;
Pressey, R. L. ;
Possingham, H. P. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2007, 16 (01) :245-258
[9]  
*EC, 2006, BIOD LIF
[10]   Targeting conservation investments in heterogeneous landscapes: A distance-function approach and application to watershed management [J].
Ferraro, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (04) :905-918