Nonlinear model reduction: A comparison between POD-Galerkin and POD-DEIM methods

被引:17
|
作者
Sipp, Denis [1 ]
Fosas de Pando, Miguel [2 ]
Schmid, Peter J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, French Aerosp Lab, ONERA, 8 Rue Vertugadins, F-92190 Meudon, France
[2] Univ Cadiz, Escuela Super Ingn, Dpto Ingn Mecan & Diseno Ind, Puerto Real 11519, Spain
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Math, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Model reduction; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Galerkin method; Discrete empirical interpolation method; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; CYLINDER WAKE; STABILITY; SYSTEMS; REGION; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104628
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Several nonlinear model reduction techniques are compared for the three cases of the non-parallel version of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, the transient regime of flow past a cylinder at Re = 100 and fully developed flow past a cylinder at the same Reynolds number. The linear terms of the governing equations are reduced by Galerkin projection onto a POD basis of the flow state, while the reduced nonlinear convection terms are obtained either by a Galerkin projection onto the same state basis, by a Galerkin projection onto a POD basis representing the nonlinearities or by applying the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (DEIM) to a POD basis of the nonlinearities. The quality of the reduced order models is assessed as to their stability, accuracy and robustness, and appropriate quantitative measures are introduced and compared. In particular, the properties of the reduced linear terms are compared to those of the full-scale terms, and the structure of the nonlinear quadratic terms is analyzed as to the conservation of kinetic energy. It is shown that all three reduction techniques provide excellent and similar results for the cases of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation and the limit-cycle cylinder flow. For the case of the transient regime of flow past a cylinder, only the pure Galerkin techniques are successful, while the DEIM technique produces reduced-order models that diverge in finite time. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A POD-Galerkin reduced order model for a LES filtering approach
    Girfoglio, Michele
    Quaini, Annalisa
    Rozza, Gianluigi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2021, 436
  • [22] POD-GALERKIN METHOD IN FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION
    Liberge, Erwan
    Hamdouni, Aziz
    FLOW-INDUCED VIBRATION, 2008, : 97 - 101
  • [23] POD-Galerkin FSI Analysis for Flapping Motion
    Kaneko, Shigeki
    Yoshimura, Shinobu
    BIOMIMETICS, 2023, 8 (07)
  • [24] POD/DEIM nonlinear model order reduction of an ADI implicit shallow water equations model
    Stefanescu, R.
    Navon, I. M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 237 : 95 - 114
  • [25] Application of POD-DEIM Approach for Dimension Reduction of a Diffusive Predator-Prey System with Allee Effect
    Dimitriu, Gabriel
    Navon, Ionel M.
    Stefanescu, Razvan
    LARGE-SCALE SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, LSSC 2013, 2014, 8353 : 373 - 381
  • [26] Parametric POD-Galerkin Model Order Reduction for Unsteady-State Heat Transfer Problems
    Georgaka, Sokratia
    Stabile, Giovanni
    Rozza, Gianluigi
    Bluck, Michael J.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2020, 27 (01) : 1 - 32
  • [27] Dictionary-based Model Order Reduction via POD-DEIM with Support Vector Machine for the Parametrized Burgers' Equation
    Sukuntee, Norapon
    Chaturantabut, Saifon
    THAI JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2022, : 38 - 52
  • [28] MULTILINEAR POD-DEIM MODEL REDUCTION FOR 2D AND 3D SEMILINEAR SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
    Kirsten, Gerhard
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2022, 9 (02): : 159 - 183
  • [29] Comparison of DEIM and BPIM to Speed up a POD-based Nonlinear Magnetostatic Model
    Henneron, Thomas
    Montier, Laurent
    Pierquin, Antoine
    Clenet, Stephane
    2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD COMPUTATION (CEFC), 2016,
  • [30] Comparison of DEIM and BPIM to Speed Up a POD-Based Nonlinear Magnetostatic Model
    Henneron, T.
    Montier, L.
    Pierquin, A.
    Clenet, S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2017, 53 (06)