Is the esophageal squamous epithelial barrier function impaired in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease?

被引:36
作者
Carlsson, R [1 ]
Fändriks, L
Jönsson, C
Lundell, L
Orlando, RC
机构
[1] Astra Hassle AB, Dept GI Management & Strategies, SE-43183 Molndal, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
acid perfusion; epithelial dysfunction; gastroesophageol reflux disease; heartburn; transmural potential differences;
D O I
10.1080/003655299750026155
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A disturbed epithelial barrier Function has been promoted as one factor in the pathogeneis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Wr therefore studied the effect of acid perfusion on the transmural potential difference (PD! of the distal esophagus in relation to onset of reflux symptoms. Methods: PD was assessed during perfusion with saline and with 0.1 M HCl in healthy controls (n = 17) and in GERD patients without (n = 15) or with esophagitis (n = 6) and in remission after a Fundoplication (n = 10). Heartburn and other upper GI symptoms were recorded concomitantly. Endoscopy-negative patients were studied before and after omeprazole treatment. Results: HCl perfusion induced more lumen-negative peak PD values in patients with active GERD, regardless of the presence or absence of esophagitis, than in healthy controls. After successful therapy, the PD response to acid perfusion equalled that of healthy subjects. Acid perfusion was associated with the onset of heartburn in most patients with active GERD but in none of the healthy subjects, and less frequently after medical and surgical therapy. Conclusions: The epithelial permeability to hydrogen ions differs between healthy subjects and patients with active GERD. Effective treatment, such as omeprazole or fundoplication, might improve the barrier function.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 458
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: A progress report on observer agreement
    Armstrong, D
    Bennett, JR
    Blum, AL
    Dent, J
    deDombal, FT
    Galmiche, JP
    Lundell, L
    Margulies, M
    Richter, JE
    Spechler, SJ
    Tytgat, GNJ
    Wallin, L
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 111 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [2] ENDOSCOPIC MEASUREMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL TRANSMUCOSAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    COLLINS, BJ
    MCFARLAND, RJ
    SLOAN, JM
    LOVE, AHG
    [J]. GUT, 1984, 25 (10) : 1103 - 1106
  • [3] ESOPHAGEAL TRANSMURAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX
    ECKARDT, VF
    ADAMI, B
    [J]. KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1980, 58 (06): : 293 - 297
  • [4] HOW WELL CAN QUANTITATIVE 24-HOUR INTRAESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING DISTINGUISH VARIOUS DEGREES OF REFLUX DISEASE
    GHILLEBERT, G
    DEMEYERE, AM
    JANSSENS, J
    VANTRAPPEN, G
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1995, 40 (06) : 1317 - 1324
  • [5] GOLDSTEIN JL, 1994, J LAB CLIN MED, V123, P653
  • [6] GULINO FM, 1989, HEPATOGASTROENTEROLO, V36, P290
  • [7] HERLIHY KJ, 1984, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V86, P436
  • [8] TRANSMUCOSAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE - DIAGNOSTIC VALUE IN GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX
    KHAMIS, B
    KENNEDY, C
    FINUCANE, J
    DOYLE, JS
    [J]. GUT, 1978, 19 (05) : 396 - 398
  • [9] The relationship between acid and bile reflux and symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
    Marshall, REK
    Anggiansah, A
    Owen, WA
    Owen, WJ
    [J]. GUT, 1997, 40 (02) : 182 - 187
  • [10] AMBULATORY 24-HOUR PH-METRY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE - DETERMINATION OF CRITERIA AND RELATION TO ENDOSCOPY
    MASCLEE, AAM
    DEBEST, ACAM
    DEGRAAF, R
    CLUYSENAER, OJJ
    JANSEN, JBMJ
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 25 (03) : 225 - 230