Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level

被引:155
作者
Schneider, Matthias [1 ]
Erasmus, Francois
Gerlach, Klaus Louis [2 ]
Kuhlisch, Eberhard [3 ]
Loukota, Richard A. [4 ]
Rasse, Michael [5 ]
Schubert, Johannes [6 ]
Terheyden, Hendrik [7 ]
Eckelt, Uwe
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Inst Med Informat & Biometry, Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Univ Halle, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Halle, Germany
[7] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kassel, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This randomized, clinical multicenter trial investigated the treatment outcomes of displaced condylar fractures, and whether radiographic fracture level was a prognostic factor in therapeutic decision-making between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed reduction and mandibulomaxillary fixation (CRMMF). Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with 79 displaced fractures (deviation of 100 to 450, or shortening of the ascending ramus :2 mm) of the condylar process of the mandible at 7 clinical centers were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to CRMMF (n = 30 patients) or ORIF (n = 36 patients) treatment. The following parameters were measured 6 months after the trauma. Clinical parameters included mouth opening, protrusion, and laterotrusion. Radiographic parameters included level of the fracture, deviation of the fragment, and shortening of the ascending ramus. Subjective parameters included pain (according to a visual analogue scale), discomfort, and Subjective functional impairment with a mandibular functional impairment questionnaire. Results: The difference in average mouth opening was 12 mm (P <= .001) between both treatment groups. The average pain level (visual analogue scale from 0 to 100) was 25 after CRMMF, and 1 after ORIF (P <= .001). In 53 unilateral fractures, better functional results were observed for ORIF compared with CRMMF, irrespective of fracture level (condylar base, neck, or intracapsular head). Unexpectedly, the subjective discomfort level decreased with ascending level of the fracture. In patients with bilateral condylar fractures, ORIF was especially advantageous. Conclusion: Fractures with a deviation of 10 degrees to 45 degrees, or a shortening of the ascending ramus 2 mm, should be treated with ORIF, irrespective of level of the fracture. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2544
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1934, J Am Dent Assoc
[2]   Current consensus on the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle - A method by questionnaire [J].
Baker, AW ;
McMahon, J ;
Moos, KF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 27 (04) :258-266
[3]  
Bos RRM, 1999, BRIT J ORAL MAX SURG, V37, P87
[4]   MANDIBULAR OSTEOSYNTHESIS BY MINIATURE SCREWED PLATES VIA A BUCCAL APPROACH [J].
CHAMPY, M ;
LODDE, JP ;
SCHMITT, R ;
JAEGER, JH ;
MUSTER, D .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1978, 6 (01) :14-21
[5]  
Eckelt U, 1996, Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir, V41, P115
[6]  
Eckelt U, 1981, Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl, V69, P485
[7]  
Eckelt U, 2000, MUND KIEFER GESIC S1, V4, P110
[8]   Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process - a prospective randomized multi-centre study [J].
Eckelt, Uwe ;
Schneider, Matthias ;
Erasmus, Francois ;
Gerlach, Klaus Louis ;
Kuhlisch, Eberhard ;
Loukota, Richard ;
Rasse, Michael ;
Schubert, Johannes ;
Terheyden, Hendrik .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 34 (05) :306-314
[9]   Complications of mandibular condyle fractures [J].
Ellis, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 27 (04) :255-257
[10]   RIGID FIXATION OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLE FRACTURES [J].
ELLIS, E ;
DEAN, J .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1993, 76 (01) :6-15