Detecting Preperimetric Glaucoma with Standard Automated Perimetry Using a Deep Learning Classifier

被引:177
作者
Asaoka, Ryo [1 ]
Murata, Hiroshi [1 ]
Iwase, Aiko [2 ]
Araie, Makoto [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Ophthalmol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Tajimi Iwase Eye Clin, Tajimi, Japan
[3] Kanto Cent Hosp, Mutual Aid Assoc Publ Sch Teachers, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
FREQUENCY-DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; VISUAL-FIELD DEFECTS; ALGORITHM; LAYER; OCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.029
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To differentiate the visual fields (VFs) of preperimetric open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients from the VFs of healthy eyes using a deep learning (DL) method. Design: Cohort study. Participants: One hundred seventy-one preperimetric glaucoma VFs (PPGVFs) from 53 eyes in 51 OAG patients and 108 healthy eyes of 87 healthy participants. Methods: Preperimetric glaucoma VFs were defined as all VFs before a first diagnosis of manifest glaucoma (Anderson-Patella's criteria). In total, 171 PPGVFs from 53 eyes in 51 OAG patients and 108 VFs from 108 healthy eyes in 87 healthy participants were analyzed (all VFs were tested using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 program; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). The 52 total deviation, mean deviation, and pattern standard deviation values were used as predictors in the DL classifier: a deep feed-forward neural network (FNN), along with other machine learning (ML) methods, including random forests (RF), gradient boosting, support vector machine, and neural network (NN). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of discrimination for each method. Main Outcome Measures: The AUCs obtained with each classifier method. Results: A significantly larger AUC of 92.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8%-95.4%) was obtained using the deep FNN classifier compared with all other ML methods: 79.0% (95% CI, 73.5%-84.5%) with RF, 77.6% (95% CI, 71.7%-83.5%) with gradient boosting, 71.2% (95% CI, 65.0%-77.5%), and 66.7% (95% CI, 60.1%-73.3%) with NN. Conclusions: Preperimetric glaucomaVFs can be distinguished from healthy VFs with very high accuracy using a deep FNN classifier. (C) 2016 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1974 / 1980
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Anderson D.R., 1999, Automated static perimetry, V2nd
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, P ADV NEUR INF PROC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, ICML
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, Clinical Pathways in Glaucoma
  • [6] A Method to Measure Visual Field Sensitivity at the Edges of Glaucomatous Scotomata
    Aoyama, Yuka
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Tahara, Mayumi
    Yanagisawa, Mieko
    Hirasawa, Kazunori
    Mayama, Chihiro
    Asaoka, Ryo
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (04) : 2584 - 2591
  • [7] Identifying "Preperimetric'' Glaucoma in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Iwase, Aiko
    Hirasawa, Kazunori
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Araie, Makoto
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (12) : 7814 - 7820
  • [8] Preperimetric glaucoma assessment with scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) -: Analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer by sectors
    Baraibar, Begona
    Sanchez-Cano, Ana
    Pablo, Luis E.
    Honrubia, Francisco M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (08) : 659 - 664
  • [9] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] Breiman L., 2004, Random Forests