Trade and the environment with pre-existing subsidies: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis

被引:15
作者
Bajona, Claustre [2 ]
Kelly, David L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Econ, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Econ, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
关键词
Perverse Subsidies; Pollution Emissions; China; State Owned Enterprises; WTO Agreement; Applied General Equilibrium; Emissions Intensity; STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES; REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; KUZNETS CURVE; POLLUTION; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; OWNERSHIP; SYSTEM; REFORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Countries that wish to erect trade barriers have a variety of instruments at their disposal. In addition to tariffs and quotas, countries can offer tax relief, low interest financing, reduced regulation, and other subsidies to domestic industries facing foreign competition. In a trade agreement, countries typically agree to reduce not only tariffs but also subsidies. We consider the effect of a free trade agreement on pollution emissions. We show that while reducing tariffs may indeed increase output and pollution, reductions in some subsides required by the trade agreement reduce pollution in general equilibrium for reasonable parameter values. Reducing subsidies has three effects on pollution: (1) reducing subsidies to firms reduces pollution-causing capital accumulation, (2) if subsidized firms are more pollution intensive, then reducing subsides moves capital and labor from more to less pollution intensive firms, and (3) reducing subsidies concentrates production in more productive firms, increasing output and thus pollution. We derive straightforward conditions for which (1) and (2) outweigh (3). We then calibrate the model to China in 1997, and find that pollution has a more elastic response to reducing subsidies than to reducing tariffs. While a 5% reduction in tariffs increases all pollutants by approximately 1%, a 5% reduction in subsidies reduces pollution by 1.8-11.6%, depending on the pollutant. The reductions in pollution occur without any environmental side agreements or abatement policy changes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 278
页数:26
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Antle J.M., 1998, AGR TRADE ENV IMPACT
[2]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[3]   Will international rules on subsidies disrupt the world trading system? [J].
Bagwell, Kyle ;
Staiger, Robert W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (03) :877-895
[4]   Reforming state owned enterprises in China: Effects of WTO accession [J].
Bajona, Claustre ;
Chu, Tianshu .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2010, 13 (04) :800-823
[5]  
Barde JP, 2005, INT YB ENV RESOURCE, P254
[6]  
Birdsall N., 1992, International trade and the environment, P159
[7]   Do China's state-owned enterprises maximize profit? [J].
Choe, CW ;
Yin, XK .
ECONOMIC RECORD, 2000, 76 (234) :273-284
[8]   Trade, growth, and the environment [J].
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2004, 42 (01) :7-71
[9]   TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND INDUSTRIAL-ORGANIZATION - SOME ESTIMATES FOR CANADA [J].
COX, D ;
HARRIS, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1985, 93 (01) :115-145
[10]   Inspections, pollution prices, and environmental performance: evidence from China [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Laplante, B ;
Mamingi, N ;
Wang, H .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (03) :487-498