Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Liang, Weiyu [1 ]
Wu, Huaiyu [1 ]
Dong, Fajin [1 ]
Tian, Hongtian [1 ]
Xu, Jinfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Clin Coll 2, Shenzhen Med Ultrasond Engn Ctr, Dept Ultrasound,Affiliated Hosp 1,Jinan Univ,Shen, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ultrasound; diagnosis; meta-analysis; systematic review; rotator cuff tears; SHOULDER PAIN; ACCURACY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; US; ARTHROGRAPHY; QUALITY; MRI;
D O I
10.11152/mu-2352
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Aim: Rotator cuff (RC) tears are considered to be the main reason for shoulder pain. Although ultrasound is a useful method to detect it, its effectiveness when diagnosing RC tears has been a heated discussion. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating RC tears' ultrasound accuracy by conducting a systemically review and pooled comprehensive analysis. Materials and methods: Relevant articles up to May 2018 were searched from the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Pubmed databases. Either arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was considered as a reference standard. The results were estimated by pooled-sensitivity (P-SEN), pooled-specificity (P-SPE), pooled-diagnostic odds ratio (P-DOR), pooled-likelihood ratio+ (P-LR+), pooled-likelihood ratio- (P-LR-), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC). Result: We selected seven prospective studies in accordance with the inclusion criteria that covered 554 rotator cuff tears in 868 patients. The P-SEN, P-SPE, P-LR+, P-LR-, P-DOR, area under the SROC curve of diagnostic performance of ultrasound for RC and post-test probability were 95% (95% CI: 88 - 98), 72% (95% CI: 61 - 81), 3.41 (95% CI: 2.40 - 4.84), 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03 - 0.16), 45.31 (95% CI: 21.04 - 97.59), 89% (95% CI: 0.86 - 0.91), and 46% and 2%, respectively. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ultrasound has a high efficiency for RC tears' diagnosis. It can be a promising method in patients with suspected RC tears because of its high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Evaluation of supraspinatus muscle tears by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with surgical findings [J].
Abd-ElGawad, Ehab A. ;
Ibraheem, Mohammed A. ;
Fouly, Ezzat H. .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (04) :829-834
[2]   Ultrasound of the shoulder [J].
Allen, G.M. ;
Wilson, D.J. .
European Journal of Ultrasound, 2001, 14 (01) :3-9
[3]   Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study [J].
Buerkner, Paul-Christian ;
Doebler, Philipp .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (18) :3061-3077
[4]   Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Shoulder Ultrasound to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Community Hospital for the Detection of Supraspinatus Rotator Cuff Tears with Improved Worktime Room Efficiency [J].
Co, Steven ;
Bhalla, Sonny ;
Rowan, Kevin ;
Aippersbach, Sven ;
Bicknell, Simon .
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2012, 63 (03) :170-176
[5]  
Cole Brandi, 2016, Shoulder Elbow, V8, P250, DOI 10.1177/1758573216658800
[6]   Accuracy of MRI, MR Arthrography, and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Jesus, Joseph O. ;
Parker, Laurence ;
Frangos, Andrea J. ;
Nazarian, Levon N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (06) :1701-1707
[7]  
Elmorsy A, 2017, POL J RADIOL, V82, P634, DOI 10.12659/PJR.903004
[8]   Site and size of rotator-cuff tear - Findings at ultrasound, double-contrast arthrography, and computed tomography arthrography with surgical correlation [J].
Farin, PU ;
Kaukanen, E ;
Jaroma, H ;
Vaatainen, U ;
Miettinen, H ;
Soimakallio, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1996, 31 (07) :387-394
[9]  
Friedman R L, 1993, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V2, P22, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80133-X
[10]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560