Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Liang, Weiyu [1 ]
Wu, Huaiyu [1 ]
Dong, Fajin [1 ]
Tian, Hongtian [1 ]
Xu, Jinfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Clin Coll 2, Shenzhen Med Ultrasond Engn Ctr, Dept Ultrasound,Affiliated Hosp 1,Jinan Univ,Shen, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ultrasound; diagnosis; meta-analysis; systematic review; rotator cuff tears; SHOULDER PAIN; ACCURACY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; US; ARTHROGRAPHY; QUALITY; MRI;
D O I
10.11152/mu-2352
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Aim: Rotator cuff (RC) tears are considered to be the main reason for shoulder pain. Although ultrasound is a useful method to detect it, its effectiveness when diagnosing RC tears has been a heated discussion. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating RC tears' ultrasound accuracy by conducting a systemically review and pooled comprehensive analysis. Materials and methods: Relevant articles up to May 2018 were searched from the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Pubmed databases. Either arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was considered as a reference standard. The results were estimated by pooled-sensitivity (P-SEN), pooled-specificity (P-SPE), pooled-diagnostic odds ratio (P-DOR), pooled-likelihood ratio+ (P-LR+), pooled-likelihood ratio- (P-LR-), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC). Result: We selected seven prospective studies in accordance with the inclusion criteria that covered 554 rotator cuff tears in 868 patients. The P-SEN, P-SPE, P-LR+, P-LR-, P-DOR, area under the SROC curve of diagnostic performance of ultrasound for RC and post-test probability were 95% (95% CI: 88 - 98), 72% (95% CI: 61 - 81), 3.41 (95% CI: 2.40 - 4.84), 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03 - 0.16), 45.31 (95% CI: 21.04 - 97.59), 89% (95% CI: 0.86 - 0.91), and 46% and 2%, respectively. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ultrasound has a high efficiency for RC tears' diagnosis. It can be a promising method in patients with suspected RC tears because of its high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Evaluation of supraspinatus muscle tears by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with surgical findings
    Abd-ElGawad, Ehab A.
    Ibraheem, Mohammed A.
    Fouly, Ezzat H.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (04) : 829 - 834
  • [2] Ultrasound of the shoulder
    Allen, G.M.
    Wilson, D.J.
    [J]. European Journal of Ultrasound, 2001, 14 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [3] Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study
    Buerkner, Paul-Christian
    Doebler, Philipp
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (18) : 3061 - 3077
  • [4] Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Shoulder Ultrasound to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Community Hospital for the Detection of Supraspinatus Rotator Cuff Tears with Improved Worktime Room Efficiency
    Co, Steven
    Bhalla, Sonny
    Rowan, Kevin
    Aippersbach, Sven
    Bicknell, Simon
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2012, 63 (03): : 170 - 176
  • [5] Cole Brandi, 2016, Shoulder Elbow, V8, P250, DOI 10.1177/1758573216658800
  • [6] Accuracy of MRI, MR Arthrography, and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis
    de Jesus, Joseph O.
    Parker, Laurence
    Frangos, Andrea J.
    Nazarian, Levon N.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (06) : 1701 - 1707
  • [7] Elmorsy A, 2017, POL J RADIOL, V82, P634, DOI 10.12659/PJR.903004
  • [8] Site and size of rotator-cuff tear - Findings at ultrasound, double-contrast arthrography, and computed tomography arthrography with surgical correlation
    Farin, PU
    Kaukanen, E
    Jaroma, H
    Vaatainen, U
    Miettinen, H
    Soimakallio, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1996, 31 (07) : 387 - 394
  • [9] Friedman R L, 1993, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V2, P22, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80133-X
  • [10] Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414): : 557 - 560