PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FORACTION

被引:97
作者
Abelson, Julia [1 ]
Wagner, Frank [2 ]
DeJean, Deirdre [3 ]
Boesveld, Sarah [3 ]
Gauvin, Francois-Pierre [4 ]
Bean, Sally [5 ]
Axler, Renata [6 ]
Petersen, Stephen [7 ]
Baidoobonso, Shamara [8 ]
Pron, Gaylene [7 ]
Giacomini, Mita [3 ]
Lavis, John [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[4] McMaster Hlth Forum, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
[7] Hlth Qual Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Canc Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Public involvement; Patient involvement; Framework; Health technology assessment; PERSPECTIVES; ENGAGEMENT; CONSUMERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462316000362
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: As health technology assessment (HTA) organizations in Canada and around the world seek to involve the public and patients in their activities, frameworks to guide decisions about whom to involve, through which mechanisms, and at what stages of the HTA process have been lacking. The aim of this study was to describe the development and outputs of a comprehensive framework for involving the public and patients in a government agency's HTA process. Methods: The framework was informed by a synthesis of international practice and published literature, a dialogue with local, national and international stakeholders, and the deliberations of a government agency's public engagement subcommittee in Ontario, Canada. Results: The practice and literature synthesis failed to identify a single, optimal approach to involving the public and patients in HTA. Choice of methods should be considered in the context of each HTA stage, goals for incorporating societal and/or patient perspectives into the process, and relevant societal and/or patient values at stake. The resulting framework is structured around four actionable elements: (i) guiding principles and goals for public and patient involvement (PPI) in HTA, (ii) the establishment of a common language to support PPI efforts, (iii) a flexible array of PPI approaches, and (iv) on-going evaluation of PPI to inform adjustments over time. Conclusions: A public and patient involvement framework has been developed for implementation in a government agency's HTA process. Core elements of this framework may apply to other organizations responsible for HTA and health system quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 264
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Abelson J, 2004, CHANGING HLTH CARE C, V2
[2]   Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice [J].
Abelson, Julia ;
Giacomini, Mita ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Gauvin, Francois-Pieffe .
HEALTH POLICY, 2007, 82 (01) :37-50
[3]   ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF CITIZEN DELIBERATIONS ON THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY PROCESS [J].
Abelson, Julia ;
Bombard, Yvonne ;
Gauvin, Francois-Pierre ;
Simeonov, Dorina ;
Boesveld, Sarah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 29 (03) :282-289
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, OXFORD HDB PUBLIC MA
[5]   Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial [J].
Boivin, Antoine ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Lacombe, Real ;
Burgers, Jako ;
Grol, Richard .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
[6]  
Bombard Y, 2009, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PI
[7]   Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach [J].
Bombard, Yvonne ;
Abelson, Julia ;
Simeonov, Donna ;
Gauvin, Francois-Pierre .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2011, 73 (01) :135-144
[8]   Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Jones, Christopher .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 23 (01) :30-35
[9]  
Carman K.L., 2013, Public Deliberation to Elicit Input on Health Topics: Findings from a Literature Review
[10]   Maximizing the Impact of Systematic Reviews in Health Care Decision Making: A Systematic Scoping Review of Knowledge-Translation Resources [J].
Chambers, Duncan ;
Wilson, Paul M. ;
Thompson, Carl A. ;
Hanbury, Andria ;
Farley, Katherine ;
Light, Kate .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2011, 89 (01) :131-156