Two-phased composite I-distance indicator approach for evaluation of countries' information development

被引:29
作者
Dobrota, Marina [1 ]
Martic, Milan [1 ]
Bulajic, Milica [1 ]
Jeremic, Veljko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
Information and Communication; Technologies (ICT); ICT Development Index (IDI); Composite indicators; I-distance method; CIDI methodology; Uncertainty analysis; Sensitivity analysis; HIGHER-EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; DIGITAL DIVIDE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITY RANKINGS; ICT; BENCHMARKING; HEALTH; UNCERTAINTY; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.003
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) is an important issue that affects countries' socioeconomic prosperity, and the majority of studies indicate that the productivity effect of ICT is quite significant. Thus, measuring the countries information development can gain numerous benefits since comparisons and rankings create a major challenge for countries' further advancement and development. The aim of this paper is multiple. It firstly elaborates the term of the information society and examines countries' ICT development. Secondly, it debates on the importance of measurement and ranking, emphasizing the methods of measuring the information society. It reviews the ICT Development Index (IDI) as one of these methods, pointing to its drawbacks. The disadvantages of the IDI are mostly related to its bias and uncertainty. This paper accentuates the importance of the stability and objectiveness of a measurement method, and for this reason it presents the Composite I-distance Indicator (CIDI) methodology for measuring countries' ICT development that overcomes these drawbacks. In the case study, we analysed a dataset of 157 countries. The results presented in this study clearly indicate that the CIDI ranking methodology is unbiased and more stable than the official IDI ranking methodology, and can be used as an appropriate framework for information society evaluation measurement. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 420
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Benchmarking health IT among OECD countries: better data for better policy [J].
Adler-Milstein, Julia ;
Ronchi, Elettra ;
Cohen, Genna R. ;
Winn, Laura A. Pannella ;
Jha, Ashish K. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 21 (01) :111-116
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GLOBAL SENSITIVITY A, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470725184.CH4
[3]   How Reliable Are County and Regional Health Rankings? [J].
Arndt, Stephan ;
Acion, Laura ;
Caspers, Kristin ;
Blood, Phyllis .
PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) :497-502
[4]   Lessons learned - Review of LCAs for ICT products and services [J].
Arushanyan, Yevgeniya ;
Ekener-Petersen, Elisabeth ;
Finnveden, Goran .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2014, 65 (02) :211-234
[5]   Information and Communications Technology Development and the Digital Divide: A Global and Regional Assessment [J].
Ayanso, Anteneh ;
Cho, Danny I. ;
Lertwachara, Kaveepan .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 20 (01) :60-77
[6]   Partial correlation and conditional correlation as measures of conditional independence [J].
Baba, K ;
Shibata, R ;
Sibuya, M .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2004, 46 (04) :657-664
[7]   The case for technology in developing regions [J].
Brewer, E ;
Demmer, M ;
Du, BW ;
Ho, M ;
Kam, M ;
Nedevschi, S ;
Pal, J ;
Patra, R ;
Surana, S ;
Fall, K .
COMPUTER, 2005, 38 (06) :25-+
[8]  
Bruggemann R, 2011, ENVIRON ECOL STAT SE, V5, P1
[9]  
Budimir M, 2014, EKON VJESN, V27, P171
[10]   ICT and productivity: conclusions from the empirical literature [J].
Cardona, M. ;
Kretschmer, T. ;
Strobel, T. .
INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 25 (03) :109-125