Household Crowding Measures: A Comparison and External Test of Validity

被引:8
|
作者
Torshizian, Eilya [1 ,4 ]
Grimes, Arthur [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Econ, Owen G Glenn Bldg,12 Grafton Rd, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Motu Econ & Publ Policy Res, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Govt, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Principal Econ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Cross-sectional models; General welfare; Well-being; General regional economics; Economic sociology; RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION; INDEXES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10902-020-00302-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Analysts may have multiple measures of household crowding, and so need to know which measure to emphasise. We analyse the relationships between alternative subjective and objective crowding measures and assess how well these alternative measures predict a measure of residential satisfaction. Statistically, a perceived crowding (PC) measure outperforms the people per bedroom (PPBR) measure, an objective measure of crowding. However, there may be bias in the relationship between PC and the residential satisfaction variable. Amongst objective measures, the Canadian National Occupancy Standard also outperforms PPBR. Nevertheless, all three measures are highly correlated and each helps to predict levels of residential satisfaction. Thus, any of the three measures provides a valid indicator of household crowding when assessing housing stress.
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1951
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Household Crowding Measures: A Comparison and External Test of Validity
    Eilya Torshizian
    Arthur Grimes
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, 22 : 1925 - 1951
  • [2] Set Matching Measures for External Cluster Validity
    Rezaei, Mohammad
    Franti, Pasi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (08) : 2173 - 2186
  • [3] External validation and comparison of two variants of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures for all-cause mortality
    Fortin, Yannick
    Crispo, James A. G.
    Cohen, Deborah
    McNair, Douglas S.
    Mattison, Donald R.
    Krewski, Daniel
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [4] COMPARISON OF PREDICTIVE VALIDITY AND DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF SCREENING MEASURES OF READING SKILLS
    Klingbeil, David A.
    McComas, Jennifer J.
    Burns, Matthew K.
    Helman, Lori
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2015, 52 (05) : 500 - 514
  • [5] Comparison of an external gear pump wear model with test data
    Frith, RH
    Scott, W
    WEAR, 1996, 196 (1-2) : 64 - 71
  • [6] A Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion-Related Validity
    Wefald, Andrew J.
    Mills, Maura J.
    Smith, Michael R.
    Downey, Ronald G.
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2012, 4 (01) : 67 - 90
  • [7] Are cluster validity measures (in) valid?
    Gagolewski, Marek
    Bartoszuk, Maciej
    Cena, Anna
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 581 : 620 - 636
  • [8] A Summary of Construct Validity Evidence for Two Measures of Character Strengths
    McGrath, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2023, 105 (03) : 302 - 313
  • [9] VALIDITY OF THE BOLTZMANN EQUATION WITH AN EXTERNAL FORCE
    Esposito, Raffaele
    Guo, Yan
    Marra, Rossana
    KINETIC AND RELATED MODELS, 2011, 4 (02) : 499 - 515
  • [10] Invariant Graph Partition Comparison Measures
    Ball, Fabian
    Geyer-Schulz, Andreas
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (10):