A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis

被引:50
|
作者
Zamora, Natalia
Llamas, Jose-Maria [1 ]
Cibrian, Rosa [2 ]
Gandia, Jose-Luis [1 ]
Paredes, Vanessa
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Orthodont, Postgrad Orthodont Masters Course, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Physiol, Valencia, Spain
来源
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL | 2012年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
Cone Beam Computed Tomography; cephalometry; landmark; orthodontics; reliability; LINEAR ACCURACY; BEAM; IDENTIFICATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.4317/medoral.17721
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) allows the possibility of modifying some of the diagnostic tools used in orthodontics, such as cephalometry. The first step must be to study the characteristics of these devices in terms of accuracy and reliability of the most commonly used landmarks. The aims were 1- To assess intra and inter-observer reliability in the location of anatomical landmarks belonging to hard tissues of the skull in images taken with a CBCT device, 2- To determine which of those landmarks are more vs. less reliable and 3- To introduce planes of reference so as to create cephalometric analyses appropriated to the 3D reality. Study design: Fifteen patients who had a CBCT (i-CAT (R)) as a diagnostic register were selected. To assess the reproducibility on landmark location and the differences in the measurements of two observers at different times, 41 landmarks were defined on the three spatial axes (X,Y,Z) and located. 3.690 measurements were taken and, as each determination has 3 coordinates, 11.070 data were processed with SPSS (R) statistical package. To discover the reproducibility of the method on landmark location, an ANOVA was undertaken using two variation factors: time (t1, t2 and t3) and observer (Ob1 and Ob2) for each axis (X, Y and Z) and landmark. The order of the CBCT scans submitted to the observers (Ob1, Ob2) at t1, t2, and t3, were different and randomly allocated. Multiple comparisons were undertaken using the Bonferroni test. The intra- and inter-examiner ICC's were calculated. Results: Intra- and inter- examiner reliability was high, both being ICC >= 0.99, with the best frequency on axis Z. Conclusions: The most reliable landmarks were: Nasion, Sella, Basion, left Porion, point A, anterior nasal spine, Pogonion, Gnathion, Menton, frontozygomatic sutures, first lower molars and upper and lower incisors. Those with less reliability were the supraorbitals, right zygion and posterior nasal spine.
引用
收藏
页码:E678 / E688
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography
    DeCesare, A.
    Secanell, M.
    Lagravere, M. O.
    Carey, J.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (07)
  • [22] Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions
    da Neiva, Marcelo Baiao
    Soares, Alvaro Cavalheiro
    Lisboa, Cinthia de Oliveira
    Vilella, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
    Motta, Alexandre Trindade
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [23] Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marco Serafin
    Benedetta Baldini
    Federico Cabitza
    Gianpaolo Carrafiello
    Giuseppe Baselli
    Massimo Del Fabbro
    Chiarella Sforza
    Alberto Caprioglio
    Gianluca M. Tartaglia
    La radiologia medica, 2023, 128 : 544 - 555
  • [24] Comparison of the observer reliability of cranial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiograph and three-dimensional computed tomography scans
    Kim, Jae-Young
    Lee, Dong-Keun
    Lee, Sang-Han
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2010, 36 (04) : 262 - 269
  • [25] Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images
    Lagravere, M. O.
    Major, P. W.
    Carey, J.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (07) : 400 - 408
  • [26] Pilot study for three-dimensional cephalometric Enlow's counterpart analysis: Vertical track. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional comparison
    D'Attilio, Michele
    Falone, Giulia
    Pipitone, Rossana
    Moscagiuri, Francesco
    Caroccia, Francesco
    Peluso, Antonino
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2024, 27 : 33 - 41
  • [27] Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking
    Dot, G.
    Rafflenbeul, F.
    Arbotto, M.
    Gajny, L.
    Rouch, P.
    Schouman, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (10) : 1367 - 1378
  • [28] The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study
    Li, Chenshuang
    Teixeira, Hellen
    Tanna, Nipul
    Zheng, Zhong
    Chen, Stephanie Hsiang Yi
    Zou, Min
    Chung, Chun-Hsi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [29] Assessment of the Reliability and Repeatability of Landmarks Using 3-D Cephalometric Software
    Frongia, Gianluigi
    Piancino, Maria Grazia
    Bracco, Andrea Adriano
    Crincoli, Vito
    Debernardi, Cesare Lorenzo
    Bracco, Pietro
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2012, 30 (04): : 255 - 263
  • [30] Cephalometric Screening Assessment for Superior Airway Space Narrowing-Added Value of Three-Dimensional Imaging
    Meisgeier, Axel
    Duerrschnabel, Florian
    Pienkohs, Simon
    Weiser, Annabell
    Neff, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (09)