Predicting Calorific Value of Thar Lignite Deposit: A Comparison between Back-propagation Neural Networks (BPNN), Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)

被引:11
作者
Ahmed, Waqas [1 ]
Muhammad, Khan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Siddiqui, Fahad Irfan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Engn & Technol UET, Peshawar, Pakistan
[2] Univ Engn & Technol Peshawar, Dept Min Engn, Peshawar, Pakistan
[3] UET Peshawar, Natl Ctr AI, Intelligent Informat Proc Lab, Peshawar, Pakistan
[4] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol Jamshoro, Dept Min Engn, Jamshoro, Pakistan
关键词
HIGHER HEATING VALUE; RANDOM FOREST; VALUE GCV; MODELS; COALS;
D O I
10.1080/08839514.2020.1824091
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Calorific value provides a strong measure of useful energy during coal utilization. Previously, different AI techniques have been used for the prediction of calorific value; however, one model is not valid for all geographic locations. In this research, Lower Calorific Value (LCV) of the Thar coal region in Pakistan is predicted from proximate analysis of 693 drill holes extending to 9,000 sq. km. Researchers have applied different techniques to produce the best model for prediction of calorific value; however, Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT) has not been used for this purpose. A comparison of GBT, Back-propagation Neural Networks (BPNN), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) is presented to predict the calorific value from a total of 8,039 samples with 1 m support interval. The samples were split randomly into 70:15:15 for training, testing, and validation of GBT, BPNN, and MLR models, reporting correlations of 0.90, 0.89, and 0.80, respectively. The features' importance was reported by the intuitive and best-performing GBT model in decreasing order of importance as: Volatile Matter, Fixed Carbon, Moisture, and Ash with corresponding feature importance values of 0.50, 0.30, 0.12, and 0.08.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1136
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey [J].
Abiodun, Oludare Isaac ;
Jantan, Aman ;
Omolara, Abiodun Esther ;
Dada, Kemi Victoria ;
Mohamed, Nachaat AbdElatif ;
Arshad, Humaira .
HELIYON, 2018, 4 (11)
[2]   Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks [J].
Acikkar, Mustafa ;
Sivrikaya, Osman .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2018, 26 (05) :2541-2552
[3]   Linear regression-based correlations for estimation of high heating values of Pakistani lignite coals [J].
Akhtar, Javaid ;
Sheikh, Naseer ;
Munir, Shahid .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2017, 39 (10) :1063-1070
[4]   Proximate analysis based multiple regression models for higher heating value estimation of low rank coals [J].
Akkaya, Ali Volkan .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 90 (02) :165-170
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
[6]   Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks Using Well Logs and Drilling Data [J].
Asadi, Adel .
ISRM EUROPEAN ROCK MECHANICS SYMPOSIUM EUROCK 2017, 2017, 191 :279-286
[7]  
Belkhir F, 2016, INT RENEW ENERG CONG
[8]  
Bock S., 2018, An improvement of the convergence proof of the ADAM-Optimizer, P1
[9]   Simultaneous prediction of coal rank parameters based on ultimate analysis using regression and artificial neural network [J].
Chelgani, S. Chehreh ;
Mesroghli, Sh. ;
Hower, James C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2010, 83 (01) :31-34
[10]   On the Use of Conventional and Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Gross Calorific Value (GCV) of Coal [J].
Erik, Nazan Yalcin ;
Yilmaz, Isik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2011, 31 (01) :32-59