Myeloma: Classification and Risk Assessment

被引:18
|
作者
Fonseca, Rafael [1 ]
Monge, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Div Hematol & Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE MGUS; BORTEZOMIB-THALIDOMIDE-DEXAMETHASONE; ADVERSE PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; GENE-EXPRESSION PROFILES; MARROW PLASMA-CELLS; MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY; MOLECULAR CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.07.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease for which several new treatments are available. Much has been learned about its biology over the past 15 years. We now understand that there are various subtypes of the disease, each one associated with different outcomes and clinical pathological features. While a detailed classification of the disease into at least seven or eight major subtypes is possible, a practical clinical approach classifies the disease into high-risk and not-high-risk MM. This classification has allowed for tailored approaches to therapy and treatment planning. Furthermore, the discussion of outcomes with patients should include risk stratification, as the prospects for survival are quite different depending on whether the patient has high-risk MM or not. The tools for measuring risk subcategory are widely available and now routinely employed in the clinic. The continued search for genetic abnormalities that underlie the biology of MM may allow for even better precision therapy in the future. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 566
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A fuzzy classification model for myocardial infarction risk assessment
    Sid Ahmed Mokeddem
    Applied Intelligence, 2018, 48 : 1233 - 1250
  • [32] Android App Classification and Permission Usage Risk Assessment
    Shen, Yidong
    Xu, Ming
    Zheng, Ning
    Xu, Jian
    Xia, Wenjing
    Wu, Yiming
    Qiao, Tong
    Yang, Tao
    COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING: NETWORKING, APPLICATIONS AND WORKSHARING, COLLABORATECOM 2017, 2018, 252 : 567 - 577
  • [33] Site Classification for Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment in Australia
    McPherson, Andrew
    Hall, Lisa
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 103 (2A) : 1085 - 1102
  • [34] A Risk Assessment Approach to Severity Classification in Animal Research
    Morton, David B.
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2012, 40 (05): : P2 - P3
  • [35] A fuzzy classification model for myocardial infarction risk assessment
    Mokeddem, Sid Ahmed
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (05) : 1233 - 1250
  • [36] Simplified tools for the risk assessment and classification of existing buildings
    O'Reilly, Gerard J.
    Nafeh, Al Mouayed Bellah
    Shahnazaryan, Davit
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 1744 - 1751
  • [37] A test of watershed classification systems for ecological risk assessment
    Detenbeck, NE
    Batterman, SL
    Brady, VJ
    Brazner, JC
    Snarski, VM
    Taylor, DL
    Thompson, JA
    Arthur, JW
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (04) : 1174 - 1181
  • [38] Safety Risk Factors Identification and Safety Risk Classification Assessment for Rural Roadsides
    Tang, Tianpei
    Zhu, Senlai
    Cao, Yang
    CICTP 2019: TRANSPORTATION IN CHINA-CONNECTING THE WORLD, 2019, : 3878 - 3889
  • [39] Inconsistencies in the risk classification of alien species and implications for risk assessment in the European Union
    Matthews, J.
    Van der Velde, G.
    Collas, F. P. L.
    De Hoop, L.
    Koopman, K. R.
    Hendriks, A. J.
    Leuven, R. S. E. W.
    ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [40] Multiple myeloma: Cytogenetic Classification
    Smadja, V
    Fruchart, C
    Dutel, JL
    Isnard, F
    Grange, MJ
    Monconduit, M
    Bastard, C
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 502 - 502