Dose escalation can maximize therapeutic potential of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

被引:6
作者
Maraz, Aniko [1 ]
Cserhati, Adrienn [1 ]
Uhercsak, Gabriella [1 ]
Szilagyi, Eva [1 ]
Varga, Zoltan [1 ]
Revesz, Janos [2 ,3 ]
Koszo, Renata [1 ]
Varga, Linda [1 ]
Kahan, Zsuzsanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Dept Oncotherapy, Koranyi Fasor 12, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Borsod Cty Hosp, Inst Radiotherapy & Clin Oncol, Szentpeteri Kapu 72-76, H-3526 Miskolc, Hungary
[3] Univ Acad Hosp, Szentpeteri Kapu 72-76, H-3526 Miskolc, Hungary
关键词
Metastatic renal cell cancer; Sunitinib; Dose escalation; Improved outcome; Toxicity; TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; PHASE-II TRIAL; INTERFERON-ALPHA; ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE; ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY; SU11248; MECHANISMS; EFFICACY; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4209-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, based on limited evidence, increased sunitinib exposure is associated with better outcome. The survival and toxicity data of patients receiving individualized dose escalated sunitinib therapy as compared to standard management were analyzed in this study. Methods: From July 2013, the data of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with slight progression but still a stable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria treated with an escalated dose of sunitinib (first level: 62.5 mg/day in 4/2 or 2 x 2/1 scheme, second level: 75 mg/day in 4/2 or 2 x 2/1 scheme) were collected prospectively. Regarding characteristics, outcome, and toxicity data, an explorative retrospective analysis of the register was carried out, comparing treatments after and before July 1, 2013 in the study (selected patients for escalated dose) and control (standard dose) groups, respectively. Results: The study involved 103 patients receiving sunitinib therapy with a median overall and progression free survival of 25.36 +/- 2.62 and 14.2 +/- 3.22 months, respectively. Slight progression was detected in 48.5% of them. First and second-level dose escalation were indicated in 18.2% and 4.1% of patients, respectively. The dosing scheme was modified in 22.2%. The median progression free survival (39.7 +/- 5.1 vs 14.2 +/- 1.3 months (p = 0.037)) and the overall survival (57.5 +/- 10.7 vs 27.9 +/- 2.5 months (p = 0.044)) were significantly better in the study group (with dose escalation) than in the control group. Patients with nephrectomy and lower Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) scores showed more favorable outcomes. After dose escalation, the most common adverse events were worsening or development of fatigue, hypertension, stomatitis, and weight loss of over 10%. Conclusions: Escalation of sunitinib dosing in selected patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, especially in case of slight progression, based on tolerable toxicity is safe and improves outcome. Dose escalation in 12.5 mg steps may be recommended for properly educated patients.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[12]   VEGF-targeted therapy: mechanisms of anti-tumour activity [J].
Ellis, Lee M. ;
Hicklin, Daniel J. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2008, 8 (08) :579-591
[13]   Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Escudier, B. ;
Porta, C. ;
Schmidinger, M. ;
Rioux-Leclercq, N. ;
Bex, A. ;
Khoo, V. ;
Gruenvald, V. ;
Horwich, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 :v58-v68
[14]  
Escudier B., ESMO 2017 NIVOLUMAB
[15]   Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer [J].
Faivre, S ;
Delbaldo, C ;
Vera, K ;
Robert, C ;
Lozahic, S ;
Lassau, N ;
Bello, C ;
Deprimo, S ;
Brega, A ;
Massimini, G ;
Armand, JP ;
Scigalla, P ;
Raymond, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (01) :25-35
[16]   Chemokines in tumor-associated angiogenesis [J].
Gerber, Peter Arne ;
Hippe, Andreas ;
Buhren, Bettina Alexandra ;
Mueller, Anja ;
Homey, Bernhard .
BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 390 (12) :1213-1223
[17]   Lysosomal Sequestration of Sunitinib: A Novel Mechanism of Drug Resistance [J].
Gotink, Kristy J. ;
Broxterman, Henk J. ;
Labots, Mariette ;
de Haas, Richard R. ;
Dekker, Henk ;
Honeywell, Richard J. ;
Rudek, Michelle A. ;
Beerepoot, Laurens V. ;
Musters, Rene J. ;
Jansen, Gerrit ;
Griffioen, Arjan W. ;
Assaraf, Yehuda G. ;
Pili, Roberto ;
Peters, Godefridus J. ;
Verheul, Henk M. W. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (23) :7337-7346
[18]   Reversible Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition and Acquired Resistance to Sunitinib in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evidence from a Xenograft Study [J].
Hammers, Hans J. ;
Verheul, Henk M. ;
Salumbides, Brenda ;
Sharma, Rajni ;
Rudek, Michelle ;
Jaspers, Janneke ;
Shah, Preeti ;
Ellis, Leigh ;
Shen, Li ;
Paesante, Silvia ;
Dykema, Karl ;
Furge, Kyle ;
Teh, Bin T. ;
Netto, George ;
Pili, Roberto .
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 9 (06) :1525-1535
[19]   Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis [J].
Houk, Brett E. ;
Bello, Carlo L. ;
Poland, Bill ;
Rosen, Lee S. ;
Demetri, George D. ;
Motzer, Robert J. .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (02) :357-371
[20]   A Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-analysis of Sunitinib Malate (SU11248) and Its Primary Metabolite (SU12662) in Healthy Volunteers and Oncology Patients [J].
Houk, Brett E. ;
Bello, Carlo L. ;
Kang, Dongwoo ;
Amantea, Michael .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (07) :2497-2506