Comparison of camptothecin derivatives presently in clinical trials: genotoxic potency and mitotic recombination

被引:24
作者
Cunha, KS
Reguly, ML
Graf, U
de Andrade, HHR
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Genet, Lab Mutagenese, BR-91501970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Goias, Dept Ciencias Fisiol, BR-74001970 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Anim Sci, Sect Physiol & Anim Husb, CH-8603 Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1093/mutage/17.2.141
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The genotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) and its clinical antineoplastic analogues irinotecan (CPT-11) and topotecan (TPT) were evaluated using the wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster. These compounds stabilize and trap the topoisomerase I-DNA complex, preventing the religation step of the breakage/rejoining reaction mediated by the enzyme. The standard version of the wing SMART was used to evaluate the three compounds and to compare the wing spots induced in marker-heterozygous and balancer-heterozygous flies. The results demonstrate that all compounds tested have a significant genotoxic effect in both genotypes analysed. At the same time, a comparison of the clone induction frequencies in marker-heterozygous; and balancer-heterozygous flies shows that mitotic recombination is the prevalent mechanism through which the three compounds induce all categories of wing spots (78-93% recombination). TPT was the most genotoxic compound, probably because substitutions of amino groups for the 9-carbon of the CPT A ring leads to compounds with greater in vivo activity. CPT and CPT-11 induced, respectively, about 7 and 28 times fewer mutant clones per millimolar exposure unit than TPT.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   MUTAGENICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY OF TOPOISOMERASE-INTERACTIVE AGENTS [J].
ANDERSON, RD ;
BERGER, NA .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1994, 309 (01) :109-142
[2]   INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOMAL-ABERRATIONS BY CAMPTOTHECIN IN ROOT-TIP CELLS OF VICIA-FABA [J].
ANDERSSON, HC ;
KIHLMAN, BA .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1992, 268 (02) :167-181
[3]   Mutagenic properties of topoisomerase-targeted drugs [J].
Baguley, BC ;
Ferguson, LR .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSION, 1998, 1400 (1-3) :213-222
[4]   Homologous recombination as a mechanism of carcinogenesis [J].
Bishop, AJR ;
Schiestl, RH .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2001, 1471 (03) :M109-M121
[5]  
CHAMPOUX JJ, 1988, GENETIC RECOMBINATIO, P655
[6]   IMPORTANCE OF REPLICATION FORK PROGRESSION FOR THE INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOME-DAMAGE AND SCE BY INHIBITORS OF DNA TOPOISOMERASES [J].
CORTES, F ;
PINERO, J ;
ORTIZ, T .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1993, 303 (02) :71-76
[7]   CYTOGENETIC EFFECTS OF INHIBITION OF TOPOISOMERASE-I OR TOPOISOMERASE-II ACTIVITIES IN THE CHO MUTANT EM9 AND ITS PARENTAL LINE AA8 [J].
CORTES, F ;
PINERO, J ;
PALITTI, F .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1993, 288 (02) :281-289
[8]   Ubiquitin-dependent destruction of topoisomerase I is stimulated by the antitumor drug camptothecin [J].
Desai, SD ;
Liu, LF ;
VazquezAbad, D ;
DArpa, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 272 (39) :24159-24164
[9]  
Dodds HM, 1998, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V286, P578
[10]   Molecular modeling studies of the DNA-topoisomerase I ternary cleavable complex with camptothecin [J].
Fan, Y ;
Weinstein, JN ;
Kohn, KW ;
Shi, LM ;
Pommier, Y .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 41 (13) :2216-2226