A new perspective on a fundamental debate: A multilevel approach to industry, corporate, and business unit effects

被引:180
作者
Misangyi, Vilmos F. [1 ]
Elms, Heather
Greckhamer, Thomas
Lepine, Jeffrey A.
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Alfred Lerner Coll Business & Econ, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, EJ Ourso Coll Business, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business Adm, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
corporate strategy; business unit performance; firm performance; multilevel methods;
D O I
10.1002/smj.530
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We utilized a multilevel approach to both estimate the relative importance of industry, corporate, and business segment effects on firm performance, as well as to demonstrate how it enables the investigation of specific strategic factors within each class of effects. Our results confirmed previous findings suggesting that although business segment effects carry the most relative importance, industry and corporate effects are also important. Among the findings regarding specific factors, we found that industry concentration and munificence, as well as the resource environment provided by corporate parents, impact performance. These findings suggest that investigators should consider both industry and corporate environments when examining performance. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 590
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities
    Adner, R
    Helfat, CE
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (10) : 1011 - 1025
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1975, Markets and Hierarchies
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1974, Strategy, structure and economic performance
  • [4] Bain J., 1968, IND ORG, V2n
  • [5] On the Use of the Coefficient of Variation as a Measure of Diversity
    Bedeian, Arthur G.
    Mossholder, Kevin W.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2000, 3 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [6] Bliese P., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P349, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
  • [7] Bourgeois III., 1981, ACAD MANAGE REV, V6, P29, DOI [DOI 10.2307/257138, 10.5465/amr.1981.4287985]
  • [8] Bowman EH, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P1
  • [9] Brush TH, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P825, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199711)18:10<825::AID-SMJ933>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-Y