Three-Dimensional Digital Stereophotogrammetry: A Reliable and Valid Technique for Measuring Scar Surface Area

被引:27
作者
Stekelenburg, Carlijn M.
van der Wal, Martijn B. A.
Knol, Dirk L.
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
van Zuijlen, Paul P. M.
机构
[1] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[3] Red Cross Hosp, Burn Ctr, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, MOVE Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Center, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Center, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ANTHROPOMETRIC PRECISION; ACCURACY; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; RELIABILITY; PATIENT; GENEX; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f675
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The surface area of scars is an important outcome parameter in scar assessment. It is often used to quantify the extent of scar features, such as pigmentation disturbances, hypertrophy, and contracture. Currently available techniques for measuring the surface area are known to be cumbersome or do not meet the basic clinimetric criteria (i.e., reliability and validity). Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry is a technique that may improve the quality of surface area measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry for measuring scar surface area. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, two independent clinicians photographed and measured 50 scar areas of 32 patients using a handheld stereographic camera, to assess reliability. Subsequently, using planimetry, the scar surface was traced on a transparent sheet (considered the accepted standard) to assess validity. Results: Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry showed good reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 and a coefficient of variation of 6.8 percent. To visualize the differences between the two observers, data were plotted and the limits of agreement were calculated at 0 +/- 0.19 x mean surface area. Also, excellent validity was found, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.99. Conclusion: This study showed that three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry is a reliable and valid tool for research purposes in the field of scar surface area measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 211
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF METHODS OF MEASURING BLOOD-PRESSURE
    ALTMAN, DG
    BLAND, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1986, 40 (03) : 274 - 275
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, MEASUREMENT MED PRAC, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511996214, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996214.005]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199231881.001.0001
  • [4] Anthony D, 1984, Nurs Times, V80, P33
  • [5] Anthony D, 1985, Nurs Times, V81, P57
  • [6] Skin scarring
    Bayat, A
    McGrouther, DA
    Ferguson, MWJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7380): : 88 - 92
  • [7] DOCUMENTATION OF WOUND SURFACE-AREA FROM TRACINGS OF WOUND PERIMETERS - CLINICAL REPORT ON 3-TECHNIQUES
    BOHANNON, RW
    PFALLER, BA
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (10): : 1622 - 1624
  • [8] Burn Scar Assessment: A Systematic Review of Different Scar Scales
    Brusselaers, Nele
    Pirayesh, Ali
    Hoeksema, Henk
    Verbelen, Jozef
    Blot, Stijn
    Monstrey, Stan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 164 (01) : E115 - E123
  • [9] Bryant R, 1992, J ET Nurs, V19, P38
  • [10] STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR MEASURING RATES OF CUTANEOUS HEALING - A COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
    BULSTRODE, CJK
    GOODE, AW
    SCOTT, PJ
    [J]. CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1986, 71 (04) : 437 - 443