Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods

被引:103
作者
Bueno, P. C. [1 ]
Vassallo, J. M. [1 ]
Cheung, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Transport Res Ctr TRANSYT, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] European Investment Bank, L-2950 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
sustainability; decision-making; transport projects; evaluation methodologies; rating systems; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; OF-THE-ART; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL IMPACTS; INDICATORS; CONSTRUCTION; APPRAISAL; FRAMEWORK; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2015.1041435
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Attempts to integrate sustainability in the decision-making process for transport infrastructure projects continue to gain momentum. A number of tools and methodological frameworks are available such as rating systems, traditional decision-making techniques, checklists, and different evaluation frameworks and models. While these tools are highly valuable, some practical issues remain unsolved. There is also a need for more standardized tools to appraise the sustainability of transport projects. This paper is a presentation of a review on the current assessment tools of sustainability applied to transport infrastructure projects. The preliminary part of the paper is an explanatory and comparative analysis of the tools and methods in terms of their effectiveness to appraise sustainability. The analysis is a critical evaluation of the current state of the art to identify the limitations of existing approaches, point out new areas of research, and propose a sustainability appraisal agenda for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 649
页数:28
相关论文
共 84 条
[51]  
Munda G., 1995, MULTICRITERIA EVALUA
[52]   Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses: a critical appraisal [J].
Niemeyer, S ;
Spash, CL .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2001, 19 (04) :567-585
[53]   COMPARISON OF THE REMBRANDT SYSTEM WITH ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
OLSON, DL ;
FLIEDNER, G ;
CURRIE, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 82 (03) :522-539
[54]  
Omura M., 2004, KOBE UNIVERSITYECONO, V50, P43
[55]  
Ophus E, 1996, JOCCA-SURF COAT INT, V79, P156
[57]  
Parkin S.S. F., 2003, P I CIVIL ENG, P19
[58]  
Pearce D., 1981, SOCIAL APPRAISAL PRO
[59]  
Pearce D., 2003, WORLD ECON, V4, P121
[60]  
Radermacher W, 1999, INT STAT REV, V67, P339