Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods

被引:103
作者
Bueno, P. C. [1 ]
Vassallo, J. M. [1 ]
Cheung, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Transport Res Ctr TRANSYT, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] European Investment Bank, L-2950 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
sustainability; decision-making; transport projects; evaluation methodologies; rating systems; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; OF-THE-ART; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL IMPACTS; INDICATORS; CONSTRUCTION; APPRAISAL; FRAMEWORK; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2015.1041435
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Attempts to integrate sustainability in the decision-making process for transport infrastructure projects continue to gain momentum. A number of tools and methodological frameworks are available such as rating systems, traditional decision-making techniques, checklists, and different evaluation frameworks and models. While these tools are highly valuable, some practical issues remain unsolved. There is also a need for more standardized tools to appraise the sustainability of transport projects. This paper is a presentation of a review on the current assessment tools of sustainability applied to transport infrastructure projects. The preliminary part of the paper is an explanatory and comparative analysis of the tools and methods in terms of their effectiveness to appraise sustainability. The analysis is a critical evaluation of the current state of the art to identify the limitations of existing approaches, point out new areas of research, and propose a sustainability appraisal agenda for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 649
页数:28
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Sustainability Trends Measured by the Greenroads Rating System [J].
Anderson, Jeralee L. ;
Muench, Stephen T. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2357) :24-32
[2]  
[Anonymous], THE ANNALS OF THE UN
[3]   Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Barfod, Michael Bruhn ;
Salling, Kim Bang ;
Leleur, Steen .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (01) :167-175
[5]  
Bristow A., 2000, Transport Pol., V7, P51, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X]
[6]   Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies [J].
Browne, David ;
Ryan, Lisa .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (03) :226-233
[7]  
Butter F. A. G. den, 1994, Environmental and Resource Economics, V4, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00692203
[8]  
Chaharbaghi K., 1999, Engineering Management Journal, V9, P41, DOI 10.1049/em:19990115
[9]   Analytic network process applied to project selection [J].
Cheng, EWL ;
Li, H .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (04) :459-466
[10]  
Ciegis R, 2009, INZ EKON, P28