Comparison of three genomic DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from maize

被引:125
|
作者
Abdel-Latif, Amani [1 ]
Osman, Gamal [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Dept Bot & Microbiol, Fac Sci, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Umm Al Qura Univ, Dept Biol, Fac Sci Appl, POB 715, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
[3] Agr Genet Engn Res Inst, Giza 12619, Egypt
来源
PLANT METHODS | 2017年 / 13卷
关键词
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS); Internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2); DNA extraction; PROTOCOL; PLANTS; FRESH; RAPD;
D O I
10.1186/s13007-016-0152-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: The world's top three cereals, based on their monetary value, are rice, wheat, and corn. In cereal crops, DNA extraction is difficult owing to rigid non-cellulose components in the cell wall of leaves and high starch and protein content in grains. The advanced techniques in molecular biology require pure and quick extraction of DNA. The majority of existing DNA extraction methods rely on long incubation and multiple precipitations or commercially available kits to produce contaminant-free high molecular weight DNA. Results: In this study, we compared three different methods used for the isolation of high-quality genomic DNA from the grains of cereal crop, Zea mays, with minor modifications. The DNA from the grains of two maize hybrids, M10 and M321, was extracted using extraction methods DNeasy Qiagen Plant Mini Kit, CTAB-method (with/ without 1% PVP) and modified Mericon extraction. Genes coding for 45S ribosomal RNA are organized in tandem arrays of up to several thousand copies and contain codes for 18S, 5.8S and 26S rRNA units separated by internal transcribed spacers ITS1 and ITS2. While the rRNA units are evolutionary conserved, ITS regions show high level of interspecific divergence and have been used frequently in genetic diversity and phylogenetic studies. In this study, the genomic DNA was then amplified with PCR using primers specific for ITS gene. PCR products were then visualized on agarose gel. Conclusion: The modified Mericon extraction method was found to be the most efficient DNA extraction method, capable to provide high DNA yields with better quality, affordable cost and less time.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples - a comparison of three procedures
    Sarnecka, Agnieszka K.
    Nawrat, Dominika
    Piwowar, Monika
    Ligeza, Janusz
    Swadzba, Jakub
    Wojcik, Piotr
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 23 (01): : 52 - 58
  • [32] Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.
    Salehi, Zahra
    Amirahmadi, Atefe
    Rezaei, Arezou
    Farrokh, Parisa
    Ghasemian, Javad
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 12 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [33] Comparison of DNA extraction methods for samples from old blood collections
    Tagliaferro, Sarah Samut
    Zejnelagic, Azra
    Farrugia, Rosienne
    Wettinger, Stephanie Bezzina
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 2021, 70 (05)
  • [34] Comparison of Methods for DNA Extraction From a Single Chironomid for PCR Analysis
    Wang, Qian
    Wang, Xinhua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2012, 44 (02) : 421 - 426
  • [35] Comparison of methods for total community DNA extraction and purification from compost
    Zh. H. Yang
    Y. Xiao
    G. M. Zeng
    Zh. Y. Xu
    Y. Sh. Liu
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 74 : 918 - 925
  • [36] Comparison of methods for total community DNA extraction and purification from compost
    Yang, Zh. H.
    Xiao, Y.
    Zeng, G. M.
    Xu, Zh. Y.
    Liu, Y. Sh.
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 74 (04) : 918 - 925
  • [37] Technical note: Comparative analyses of the quality and yield of genomic DNA from invasive and noninvasive, automated and manual extraction methods
    Foley, C.
    O'Farrelly, C.
    Meade, K. G.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (06) : 3159 - 3165
  • [38] Comparison of three DNA extraction methods tested on illicit drug-related powders
    Griffin, Amy
    Kirkbride, K. Paul
    Henry, Julianne
    Painter, Ben
    Linacre, Adrian
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2023, 67
  • [39] Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for the detection and quantification of GMO in Ecuadorian manufactured food
    Pacheco Coello R.
    Pestana Justo J.
    Factos Mendoza A.
    Santos Ordoñez E.
    BMC Research Notes, 10 (1)
  • [40] AutoMate Express™ Forensic DNA Extraction System for the Extraction of Genomic DNA from Biological Samples
    Liu, Jason Y.
    Zhong, Chang
    Holt, Allison
    Lagace, Robert
    Harrold, Michael
    Dixon, Alan B.
    Brevnov, Maxim G.
    Shewale, Jaiprakash G.
    Hennessy, Lori K.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (04) : 1022 - 1030