Organ doses and lifetime attributable risk evaluations for scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients with the EOS imaging system

被引:9
作者
Branchini, Marco [1 ]
del Vecchio, Antonella [1 ]
Gigliotti, Carmen Rosaria [1 ]
Loria, Alessandro [1 ]
Zerbi, Alberto [2 ]
Calandrino, Riccardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Dept Med Phys, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, Chief Dept Radiol, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, I-20161 Milan, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2018年 / 123卷 / 04期
关键词
Scoliosis; EOS system; Organ doses; Lifetime attributable risk; RADIOGRAPHY; DETECTOR; CHILDREN; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-017-0828-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of this work is to evaluate organ doses and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality in scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients performed with EOS imaging system, in order to optimize patient dose and protocols. An anthropomorphic phantom of a normal patient, with thermoluminescent dosimeters in correspondence with the main organs at risk, was imaged with both EOS and computed radiography (CR). For each modality, effective dose was calculated from the measured organ doses. Lifetime attributable risk was computed accordingly to the Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII) and Public Health England (HPA) publications. Except for testes and eyes, which were excluded from the scan in CR protocol, for all the other organs the doses delivered with CR examination were higher than these delivered by EOS system. The effective dose in EOS examination (0.43 +/- 0.04 mSv) is about two times less than the dose in computed radiography with anti-scatter grid examination (0.87 +/- 0.09 mSv), and, consequently, also the cancer probability is lower (5.4 vs 9.7 number of any cancers induction cases per 100,000 person examined, for a 20-year-old male patient). The EOS system is efficient in limiting patient dose. The shielding of testes and the exclusion of eyes from the scan could allow to further reduce the dose.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 313
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Abul-Kasim, Kasim ;
Overgaard, Angelica ;
Maly, Pavel ;
Ohlin, Acke ;
Gunnarsson, Mikael ;
Sundgren, Pia C. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) :610-618
[2]  
BEIR VII PHASE II, 2006, HLTH RISKS EXPOSURES
[3]   EOS Imaging of the Human Pelvis: Reliability, Validity, and Controlled Comparison with Radiography [J].
Bittersohl, Bernd ;
Freitas, Joana ;
Zaps, Daniela ;
Schmitz, Matthew R. ;
Bomar, James D. ;
Muhamad, Abd R. ;
Hosalkar, Harish S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (09) :e581-e589
[4]   Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced [J].
Brenner, D. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (967) :521-523
[5]   Occupational and patient exposure as well as image quality for full spine examinations with the EOS imaging system [J].
Damet, J. ;
Fournier, P. ;
Monnin, P. ;
Sans-Merce, M. ;
Ceroni, D. ;
Zand, T. ;
Verdun, F. R. ;
Baechler, S. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06)
[6]   Diagnostic Imaging of Spinal Deformities Reducing Patients Radiation Dose With a New Slot-Scanning X-ray Imager [J].
Deschenes, Sylvain ;
Charron, Guy ;
Beaudoin, Gilles ;
Labelle, Hubert ;
Dubois, Josee ;
Miron, Marie-Claude ;
Parent, Stefan .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) :989-994
[7]   Evaluation of a full-scale gas microstrip detector for low-dose X-ray imaging [J].
Després, P ;
Beaudoin, G ;
Gravel, P ;
de Guise, JA .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2005, 536 (1-2) :52-60
[8]   Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography [J].
Dietrich, Tobias J. ;
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. ;
Schwab, Alexander ;
Pankalla, Katja ;
Buck, Florian M. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (07) :959-967
[9]  
Dubousset J., 2005, Radioprotection, V40, P245, DOI 10.1051/radiopro:2005010
[10]  
Escott BG, 2013, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V95A, P2126, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.L.00989